Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32920328›Full record

ArticleTranslational oncology2020

MET exon 14 skipping mutation, amplification and overexpression in pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma: A multi-center study.

Xue-Wen Liu, Xin-Ru Chen, Yu-Ming Rong, Ning Lyu, Chun-Wei Xu, Fang Wang, Wen-Yong Sun, San-Gao Fang, Jing-Ping Yuan, Hui-Juan Wang and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The Landscape ofJTO clinical and research reports · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Translational lung cancer research · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Targeted therapy for rare lung cancers: Status, challenges, and prospects.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Canadian Consensus Recommendations on the Management ofCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Xue-Wen LiuDepartment of Oncology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410013, PR China.
Xin-Ru ChenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China.
Yu-Ming RongDepartment of VIP Region, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China.
Ning LyuDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China.
Chun-Wei XuDepartment of Pathology, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian, PR China.
Fang WangDepartment of Molecular Diagnostic, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China.
Wen-Yong SunDepartment of Pathology, Chinese Academy of Sciences University Cancer Hospital (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, PR China.
San-Gao FangDepartment of Pathology, Daping Hospital and Research Institute of Surgery, the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, PR China.
Jing-Ping YuanDepartment of Pathology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430060, PR China.
Hui-Juan WangDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, PR China.
Wen-Xian WangDepartment of Chemotherapy, Chinese Academy of Sciences University Cancer Hospital (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, PR China.
Wen-Bin HuangDepartment of Pathology, Nanjing Hospital (Nanjing First Hospital), Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, PR China.
Jian-Ping XuDepartment of Pathology, Anhui Chest Hospital, Hefei, Anhui, PR China.
Zhen-Ying YueDapartment of Pathology, the Central Hospital of Shengli Oilfield, Dongying, PR China.
Li-Kun ChenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China. Electronic address: chenlk@sysucc.org.cn.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNZhejiang Cancer Hospital · CNDaping Hospital · CNFujian Provincial Cancer Hospital · CNNanjing Medical University · CNRenmin Hospital of Wuhan University · CNShengli Oilfield Central Hospital · CNSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center · CNThird Xiangya Hospital · CNXi'an Chest Hospital · CNZhengzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh frequency of MNNG HOS transforming (MET) exon 14 skipping mutation (MET exon 14Δ) has been reported in pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinomas (PSCs). However, the frequencies differ greatly. Our study aims to investigate the frequency of MET alterations and the correlations among MET exon 14Δ, amplification, and protein overexpression in a large cohort of PSCs. MET exon 14Δ, amplification, and protein overexpression were detected in 124 surgically resected PSCs by using Sanger sequencing, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), and immunohistochemistry (IHC) respectively. MET exon 14Δ was identified in 9 (7.3%) of 124 cases, including 6 pleomorphic carcinomas, 2 spindle cell carcinomas and 1 carcinosarcoma. MET amplification and protein overexpression were detected in 6 PSCs (4.8%) and 25 PSCs (20.2%), respectively. MET amplification was significantly associated with overexpression (P < 0.001). However, MET exon 14Δ has no correlation with MET amplification (P = 0.370) and overexpression (P = 0.080). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that pathologic stage (hazard ratio [HR], 2.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-6.01; P = 0.010) and MET amplification (HR, 4.71; 95% CI, 1.31-16.98; P = 0.018) were independent prognostic factors for poor median overall survival (mOS). MET alterations including MET exon 14Δ and amplification should be recommended as routine clinical testing in PSCs patients who may benefit from MET inhibitors. MET IHC appears to be an efficient screen tool for MET amplification in PSCs.

Identifiers

PMID32920328
PMCPMC7492996
OpenAlexW3085403806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.