Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32919778›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology2020

Role of delayed interval debulking for persistent residual disease after more than 5 cycles of chemotherapy for primary advanced ovarian cancer. An international multicenter study.

Helmut Plett, Olga T Filippova, Annalisa Garbi, Stefan Kommoss, Mikkel Rosendahl, Carrie Langstraat, Saurabh Phadnis, Mustafa Zelal Muallem, Thaïs Baert, Dennis S Chi and 10 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed, Advanced Ovarian Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 12 institutions in 7 countries.

Helmut PlettDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany; Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universiät zu Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: pletth@googlemail.com.
Olga T FilippovaGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Annalisa GarbiDivision of Gynecology, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Stefan KommossDepartment of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.
Mikkel RosendahlDepartment of Gynecology, The Juliane Marie Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Carrie LangstraatDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Saurabh PhadnisDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, United Kingdom.
Mustafa Zelal MuallemDepartment of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universiät zu Berlin, Germany.
Thaïs BaertDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany; Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, ImmunOvar Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Dennis S ChiGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Giovanni Damiano AlettiDivision of Gynecology, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Florin-Andrei TaranDepartment of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany; Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Zürich, Comprehensive Cancer Center Zürich, Switzerland.
Jan Philipp RamspottDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.
Oliver ZivanovicGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Andreas du BoisDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.
Yukio SonodaGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Ginger GardnerGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Alexander TrautDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.
Kara Long RocheGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Philipp HarterDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.
Cornell University · USKliniken Essen-Mitte · DEMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity Children's Hospital Tübingen · DEBarts Health NHS Trust · GBCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEKU Leuven · BEMayo Clinic in Arizona · USRigshospitalet · DKUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Elisa de Stanchina · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStandard of care in patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) is upfront surgery followed by chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) is an alternative in selected patients. Most data exist with IDS following 3-4 cycles chemotherapy, however, some patients experience a delay of IDS. So far, the impact of a "delayed" interval debulking surgery (DID) is poorly defined.

methodsWe analyzed data from eight international gynecology-oncology referral centers. Patients were included if they had newly diagnosed AOC and were prone to DID (minimum 5 cycles of NACT) between 2011 and 2017.

results308 patients underwent DID. 89.6% had a high-grade serous ovarian cancer. The median number of pre-op NACT was 6 cycles (range 5-9) and 6.1% of patients received additionally bevacizumab. The majority of patients had stage-IV disease (51.3%). Median duration of surgery was 210 min (range 34-561), the median surgical complexity score was 4 (range 1-16). Complete resection was achieved in 60.1%. The median number of post-op chemotherapy cycles was 2 (range 0-5). The rate of severe complications (Clavien-Dindo£3°) was 9.7% and 30 days post-op mortality was 0.3%. The median PFS and OS in patients with complete resection was 19.5 and 49.2 months compared to 14.8 and 33.0 months in patients with incomplete resection (p = 0.001), respectively. We did not observe any survival benefit for patients with cytoreduction to small residuals (1-10 mm) compared to residual disease >1 cm.

conclusionOur data may suggest that offering surgery to patients with persistent disease after 5+ cycles could be associated with favorable outcome if a complete resection is achieved. Patients who had residual disease postoperatively may experience rather peri-operative treatment burden than any benefit from DID.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialCystadenocarcinoma, SerousCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm, ResidualOvarian NeoplasmsPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesChemotherapyDebulking surgeryInterval debulkingNeo-adjuvantOvarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID32919778
PMCPMC8371927
OpenAlexW3084332728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.