Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32919762›Full record

ArticleChild abuse & neglect2020

Screening for economic hardship for child welfare-involved families during the COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid partnership response.

Barbara Fallon, Rachael Lefebvre, Delphine Collin-Vézina, Emmaline Houston, Nicolette Joh-Carnella, Tina Malti, Joanne Filippelli, Kate Schumaker, Wendy Manel, Mark Kartusch and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child abuse & neglect, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Barbara FallonFactor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Canada. Electronic address: barbara.fallon@utoronto.ca.
Rachael LefebvreFactor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Canada.
Delphine Collin-VézinaSchool of Social Work, McGill University, Canada.
Emmaline HoustonFactor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Canada.
Nicolette Joh-CarnellaFactor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Canada.
Tina MaltiDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, Canada.
Joanne FilippelliFactor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Canada.
Kate SchumakerCatholic Children's Aid Society of Toronto, Canada.
Wendy ManelCatholic Children's Aid Society of Toronto, Canada.
Mark KartuschCatholic Children's Aid Society of Toronto, Canada.
Scottye CashCollege of Social Work, The Ohio State University, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPandemics have a wide range of economic, health and social consequences related to both the spread of a disease and efforts made by government leaders to contain it which may be particularly detrimental for the child welfare-involved population. This is because child welfare agencies serve some of the highest needs children and families. A significant proportion of these families face economic hardship, and as a result of containment measures for COVID-19, more families inevitably will.

objectiveGiven the range of negative consequences related to the pandemic and the evolving supports available to families, child protection workers needed a clinical tool to guide and support work with families informed by an understanding of economic hardship. The objective of this paper is to report on the development and implementation strategy of a tool to be used for practice intervention during the pandemic.

methodsAction research methodology was utilized in the creation of the clinical tool. The tool's development and implementation occurred through an academic/child welfare sector partnership involving child welfare agencies representing diverse regions and populations in Ontario, Canada. Factor analysis of representative child welfare data from the Ontario Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect 2018 (OIS-2018) on economic hardship was used to inform the development of questions on the clinical tool.

resultsThe development and implementation strategy of the clinical tool are described, including the results from analyses of the OIS-2018.

conclusionsFuture directions for the project are discussed, including considerations for using this tool beyond the pandemic.

Indexed as

PovertyAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolChild Protective ServicesChild WelfareCohort StudiesCOVID-19FamilyFemaleHumansInfantMaleMandatory ReportingOntarioPandemicsChild protectionClinical toolsCOVID-19Economic hardshipOntario

Identifiers

PMID32919762
PMCPMC7472971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.