Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32919474›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2020

Contraception and post abortion services: qualitative analysis of users' perspectives and experiences following Zika epidemic in Honduras.

Maria Belizan, Edna Maradiaga, Javier Roberti, Maricela Casco-Aguilar, Alison F Ortez, Juan C Avila-Flores, Gloria González, Carolina Bustillo, Alejandra Calderón, Harry Bock and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Maria BelizanMother and Child Health Research Department, Qualitative Health Research Unit, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy - IECS, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Edna MaradiagaInstituto de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Parasitología Antonio Vidal, Unidad de Investigación Científica, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas UNAH, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.
Javier RobertiMother and Child Health Research Department, Qualitative Health Research Unit, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy - IECS, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Maricela Casco-AguilarInstituto de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Parasitología Antonio Vidal, Unidad de Investigación Científica, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas UNAH, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.
Alison F OrtezInstituto de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Parasitología Antonio Vidal, Unidad de Investigación Científica, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas UNAH, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.
Juan C Avila-FloresInstituto de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Parasitología Antonio Vidal, Unidad de Investigación Científica, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas UNAH, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.
Gloria GonzálezDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Escuela, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.
Carolina BustilloDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Escuela, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.
Alejandra CalderónCentro de Salud Alonso Suazo, Región Metropolitana del Distrito Central, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.
Harry BockHarry Bock. Región Metropolitana del Distrito Central, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.
María L CafferataMother and Child Health Research Department, Qualitative Health Research Unit, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy - IECS, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Adriano B TavaresDepartment of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, CH-1211, Geneva 27, Switzerland.
Jackeline AlgerInstituto de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Parasitología Antonio Vidal, Unidad de Investigación Científica, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas UNAH, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.
Moazzam AliDepartment of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, CH-1211, Geneva 27, Switzerland. alimoa@who.int.ORCID 0000-0001-6949-8976
Universidad Metropolitana de Honduras · HNInstituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria · ARWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

Large Anonymous Donor under the Grant ID 5149 for Women, Communities, and Health Systems in the Context of Zika. 5149World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundZika virus (ZIKV) infection during pregnancy has severe consequences on the new-born. The World Health Organization declared the Zika outbreak to be a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) in 2016. Health facilities in the regions most affected by Zika lacked the capacity to respond to the increased demand for contraception. The objectives were to explore healthcare users' perceptions regarding contraception, Zika prevention during pregnancy and post-abortion care (PAC) services in the context of a Zika outbreak in Tegucigalpa, Honduras, and to follow these services over time.

methodsThis study was part of a broader implementation research study. We used qualitative research consistent with grounded theory approach. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were performed with women and their partners who used contraceptive services or received PAC services. Data were collected in two stages from December 2017 to July 2018. Themes explored included contraception, Zika and PAC services.

resultsParticipants had positive attitude towards the use of contraceptive methods and demanded more information on safety, efficacy and on side effects. Health care services were inconsistent in the provision of information on Zika and contraception services. ZIKV vector transmission was known but fewer participants were aware of risk of sexual transmission of Zika. Barriers to access healthcare services included contraceptive and PAC services included distance to healthcare facilities, disorganized admission process, long waiting times and out-of-pocket expenditure to purchase medicines. Furthermore, poor quality, mistreatment and abuse of women seeking PAC was prevalent. Some positive changes were noted over time, such as improvements in infrastructure including improved privacy and cleanliness, removal of fees, requisite to bring clean water to hospital.

conclusionsOur results highlight the challenges and areas for improvement in policy and practice related to contraceptive services and PAC in the context of ZIKV infection. Public policies to prevent epidemics should focus more on providing proper sanitation; removing barriers to access and use of effective contraception as human rights priority. Zika epidemic has highlighted weaknesses in health systems that obstruct access to and use of sexual and reproductive health services. The study results call for increased efforts to improve access, especially for women of low socio-economic status and intervene at different levels to eradicate discrimination and improve equity in the provision of health care. Qualitative methods can capture the community perspectives and can provide useful information to develop interventions to improve services.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedAftercareZika VirusContraceptionEpidemicsFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHondurasHumansMalePregnancyQualitative ResearchReproductive Health ServicesZika Virus InfectionContraceptive servicesHondurasPost abortion careReproductive healthZika

Identifiers

PMID32919474
PMCPMC7488691
OpenAlexW3086652507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.