Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32919462›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2020

Which interventions increase hearing protection behaviors during noisy recreational activities? A systematic review.

Michael T Loughran, Stephanie Lyons, Christopher J Plack, Christopher J Armitage

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael T LoughranManchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, M13 9PL, Manchester, UK. michael.loughran@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1158-1096
Stephanie LyonsManchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, M13 9PL, Manchester, UK.
Christopher J PlackManchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Christopher J ArmitageManchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, M13 9PL, Manchester, UK.

Funding

Manchester Biomedical Research Centre N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHearing loss and tinnitus are global concerns that can be reduced through hearing protection behaviors (e.g., earplug use). Little is known about the effectiveness of interventions to increase hearing protection use in recreational domains. For the first time we review systematically the effectiveness of such interventions.

methodsSystematic searches of nine databases, as well as grey literature and hand-searching, were conducted. Any study design was included if it assessed quantitatively a purposeful attempt to increase hearing protection in recreational settings. Studies were excluded if they assessed noise exposure from occupational sources and headphones/earphones, as these have been reviewed elsewhere. PROSPERO protocol: CRD42018098573.

resultsEight studies were retrieved following the screening of 1908 articles. Two pretest-posttest studies detected a small to medium effect (d ≥ 0·3 ≤ 0·5), one a small effect (d ~ =0·2) and two no real effect. Three posttest experimental studies detected small to medium effects (d ≥ 0·3 ≤ 0·5). Studies were rated as "poor quality" and 17 out of a possible 93 behavior change techniques were coded, with the majority targeting the intervention function 'education'.

conclusionsHearing loss and tinnitus due to recreational noise exposure are major public health concerns yet very few studies have examined preventive interventions. The present systematic review sets the agenda for the future development and testing of evidence-based interventions designed to prevent future hearing loss and tinnitus caused by noise in recreational settings, by recommending systematic approaches to intervention design, and implementation of intervention functions beyond education, such as incentivization, enablement and modeling.

Indexed as

Ear Protective DevicesHearingRecreationHearing Loss, Noise-InducedHumansNoiseTinnitusBehavior changeHearing conservationHearing protection behaviorHearing protection interventionRecreational noise activityRecreational noise-induced hearing lossSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32919462
PMCPMC7488782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.