Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32919455›Full record

Observational studyBMC family practice2020

Patient safety culture in primary and home care services.

Letícia Martins Lousada, Francisco Clécio da Silva Dutra, Beatriz Viana da Silva, Natália Lúcia Lima de Oliveira, Ismael Brioso Bastos, Patrícia Freire de Vasconcelos, Rhanna Emanuela Fontenele Lima de Carvalho

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC family practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Safety Climate Evaluation in Primary Health Care: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Letícia Martins LousadaCeara State University, Mister Hull avenue. 2933, apto 401b, violete, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0638-4650
Francisco Clécio da Silva DutraCeara State University, Mister Hull avenue. 2933, apto 401b, violete, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3451-1664
Beatriz Viana da SilvaCeara State University, Mister Hull avenue. 2933, apto 401b, violete, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5154-5057
Natália Lúcia Lima de OliveiraCeara State University, Mister Hull avenue. 2933, apto 401b, violete, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9560-4573
Ismael Brioso BastosCeara State University, Mister Hull avenue. 2933, apto 401b, violete, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5764-841X
Patrícia Freire de VasconcelosUniversity of the integration of Brazilian lusophony, Redenção, Ceará, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6158-9221
Rhanna Emanuela Fontenele Lima de CarvalhoCeara State University, Mister Hull avenue. 2933, apto 401b, violete, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil. rhannalima@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3406-9685

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSafety culture is still a poorly studied subject in primary care and home care, although these settings are considered gateways to access to healthcare. This study aims to evaluate safety culture in primary and home care settings.

methodsAn observational cross-sectional study was carried out with 147 professionals from nine districts covered by one home care program and six primary healthcare centres. The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) was used to evaluate the safety culture, in which scores ≥75 are indicative of a positive safety culture.

resultsA total of 56 (86,1%) questionnaires returned from the home care professionals and 91 (86,6%) from the primary care professionals. The Job satisfaction domain was the best evaluated, achieving a score of 88.8 in home care and 75.1 in primary care. The achievement of high scores on Safety Climate, Job Satisfaction, Teamwork Climate, and Total SAQ was related to male gender, and time of professional experience of three to 4 years. Perception of management and Working conditions had the lowest scores, and this result was related with long time of experience.

conclusionsIt is concluded that professionals working in home care gave higher scores for safety culture in their workplace than the primary care workers.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesPatient SafetyAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMaleOrganizational CultureSafety ManagementHome care servicesPatient safety culturePrimary care

Identifiers

PMID32919455
PMCPMC7488772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.