Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32919406›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2021

Regulation of risky decision making by gonadal hormones in males and females.

Caitlin A Orsini, Shelby L Blaes, Caesar M Hernandez, Sara M Betzhold, Hassan Perera, Alexa-Rae Wheeler, Tyler W Ten Eyck, Tyler S Garman, Jennifer L Bizon, Barry Setlow

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The role of ovarian hormones in risk aversion in female rats.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Sex differences in sensitivity to dopamine receptor manipulations of risk-based decision making in rats.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Neural Mechanisms Mediating Sex Differences in Motivation for Reward: Cognitive Bias, Food, Gambling, and Drugs of Abuse.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Caitlin A OrsiniDepartment of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
Shelby L BlaesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Caesar M HernandezDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9690-5119
Sara M BetzholdDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Hassan PereraDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Alexa-Rae WheelerDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Tyler W Ten EyckDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Tyler S GarmanDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Jennifer L BizonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Barry SetlowDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA. setlow@ufl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9133-9445
University of Florida · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Interdisciplinary Training in Pathobiology and Rehabilitation Medicine.T32HD071866 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI JAMES RIMMER, Anna E. Thalacker-Mercer · 2012 to 2026
$4.8M
Decision making and basolateral amygdala dysfunction in agingRF1AG060778 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BIZON, JENNIFER LYNN, FRAZIER, CHARLES J · 2018 to 2018
$3.0M
Risk taking and cocaine use: interactions, mechanisms, and therapeutic targetsR01DA036534 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI SETLOW, BARRY · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
The essentiality of serine and glycine for skeletal muscle regeneration in agingR01AG075059 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI THALACKER-MERCER, ANNA E. · 2022 to 2025
$1.5M
Neural circuits and mechanisms underlying maladaptive risk-taking following cocaine self-administrationR00DA041493 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI ORSINI, CAITLIN ANNE · 2019 to 2021
$745k
Neural circuits and mechanisms underlying maladaptive risk-taking following cocaine self-administrationK99DA041493 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI ORSINI, CAITLIN ANNE · 2017 to 2018
$232k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG075059NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG060778NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD071866NIDA NIH HHS K99 DA041493NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA041493NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036534
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychiatric diseases characterized by dysregulated risky decision making are differentially represented in males and females. The factors that govern such sex differences, however, remain poorly understood. Using a task in which rats make discrete trial choices between a small, "safe" food reward and a large food reward accompanied by varying probabilities of footshock punishment, we recently showed that females are more risk averse than males. The objective of the current experiments was to test the extent to which these sex differences in risky decision making are mediated by gonadal hormones. Male and female rats were trained in the risky decision-making task, followed by ovariectomy (OVX), orchiectomy (ORX), or sham surgery. Rats were then retested in the task, under both baseline conditions and following administration of estradiol and/or testosterone. OVX increased choice of the large, risky reward (increased risky choice), an effect that was attenuated by estradiol administration. In contrast, ORX decreased risky choice, but testosterone administration was without effect in either ORX or sham males. Estradiol, however, decreased risky choice in both groups of males. Importantly, none of the effects of hormonal manipulation on risky choice were due to altered shock sensitivity or food motivation. These data show that gonadal hormones are required for maintaining sex-typical profiles of risk-taking behavior in both males and females, and that estradiol is sufficient to promote risk aversion in both sexes. The findings provide novel information about the mechanisms supporting sex differences in risk taking and may prove useful in understanding sex differences in the prevalence of psychiatric diseases associated with altered risk taking.

Indexed as

Decision MakingRisk-TakingAnimalsFemaleMaleRatsRats, Long-EvansRewardTestosteroneTestosterone

Identifiers

PMID32919406
PMCPMC8027379
OpenAlexW3086735307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.