Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32919402›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2021

Brain micro-architecture and disinhibition: a latent phenotyping study across 33 impulsive and compulsive behaviours.

Rafa Romero-Garcia, Roxanne W Hook, Jeggan Tiego, Richard A I Bethlehem, Ian M Goodyer, Peter B Jones, Ray Dolan, Jon E Grant, Edward T Bullmore, Murat Yücel and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Trichotillomania and Skin-Picking Disorder: An Update.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rafa Romero-GarciaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, and Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Roxanne W HookDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, and Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Jeggan TiegoSchool of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, c/o MBI, 770 Blackburn Rd, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7835-6398
Richard A I BethlehemDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, and Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0714-0685
Ian M GoodyerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, and Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Peter B JonesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, and Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0387-880X
Ray DolanMax Planck University College London Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9356-761X
Jon E Grant *Department of Psychiatry & Behavioural Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Edward T Bullmore *Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, and Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8955-8283
Murat Yücel *School of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, c/o MBI, 770 Blackburn Rd, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4705-452X
Samuel R ChamberlainDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, and Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK. S.R.Chamberlain@soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7014-8121

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MC_G0802534Wellcome Trust 095844/Z/11/ZWellcome Trust 110049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Impulsive and compulsive symptoms are common, tend to co-occur, and collectively account for a substantive global disease burden. Latent phenotyping offers a promising approach to elucidate common neural mechanisms conferring vulnerability to such symptoms in the general population. We utilised the Neuroscience in Psychiatry Network (NSPN), a cohort of young people (aged 18-29 years) in the United Kingdom, who provided questionnaire data and Magnetic Resonance Imaging scans. Partial Least Squares was used to identify brain regions in which intra-cortical myelination (measured using Magnetisation Transfer, MT) was significantly associated with a disinhibition phenotype, derived from bi-factor modelling of 33 impulsive and compulsive problem behaviours. The neuroimaging sample comprised 126 participants, mean 22.8 (2.7 SD) years old, being 61.1% female. Disinhibition scores were significantly and positively associated with higher MT in the bilateral frontal and parietal lobes. 1279 genes associated with disinhibition-related brain regions were identified, which were significantly enriched for functional biological interactions reflecting receptor signalling pathways. This study indicates common microstructural brain abnormalities contributing to a multitude of related, prevalent, problem behaviours characterised by disinhibition. Such a latent phenotyping approach provides insights into common neurobiological pathways, which may help to improve disease models and treatment approaches. Now that this latent phenotyping model has been validated in a general population sample, it can be extended into patient settings.

Indexed as

Problem BehaviorAdolescentAdultBrainCompulsive BehaviorFemaleHumansImpulsive BehaviorMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleUnited KingdomYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32919402
PMCPMC7116462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.