Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32919400›Full record

Trial reportNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2021

Left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression in adolescents: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial.

Paul E Croarkin, Ahmed Z Elmaadawi, Scott T Aaronson, G Randolph Schrodt, Richard C Holbert, Sarah Verdoliva, Karen L Heart, Mark A Demitrack, Jeffrey R Strawn

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07185438 (Feasibility, Safety, and Preliminary Clinical Efficacy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 64 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07185438 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility, Safety, and Preliminary Clinical Efficacy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in Adolescents With Depression: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorFirst Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled45ConditionsDepression - Major Depressive DisorderArmsExperimental target rTMS treatment, Conventional target rTMS treatment, Sham stimulation treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Understanding the emergence of suicidal thoughts and behaviors in adolescence from a brain and behavioral developmental perspective.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  20. Advances in the Clinical Application of Neurostimulation in Major Depression.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Paul E CroarkinDivision of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic Depression Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. croarkin.paul@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6843-6503
Ahmed Z ElmaadawiBeacon Health System, South Bend, Indiana USA, Indiana University School of Medicine, South Bend, USA.
Scott T AaronsonSheppard Pratt Health System, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
G Randolph SchrodtIntegrative Psychiatry, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
Richard C HolbertShands Psychiatric Hospital, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Sarah VerdolivaNorth American Science Associates, Inc. (NAMSA) Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Karen L HeartNeuronetics, Inc. Malvern, Pennsylvania, USA.
Mark A DemitrackTrevena, Inc. Chesterbrook, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jeffrey R StrawnDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7526-2641
Beacon Health System · USIntegrative Medicine Institute · USMayo Clinic · USNeuronetics (United States) · USSheppard Pratt Health System · USUF Health Shands Hospital · USUniversity of Cincinnati · US

Funding

Glutamatergic and GABAergic Biomarkers in rTMS for Adolescent DepressionR01MH113700 · NIMH · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI CROARKIN, PAUL E · 2017 to 2021
$2.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH113700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is prevalent and associated with a substantial psychosocial burden and mortality. There are few prior studies of interventions for TRD in adolescents. This was the largest study to date examining the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of 10-Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for adolescents with TRD. Adolescents with TRD (aged 12-21 years) were enrolled in a randomized, sham-controlled trial of TMS across 13 sites. Treatment resistance was defined as an antidepressant treatment record level of 1 to 4 in a current episode of depression. Intention-to-treat patients (n = 103) included those randomly assigned to active NeuroStar TMS monotherapy (n = 48) or sham TMS (n = 55) for 30 daily treatments over 6 weeks. The primary outcome measure was change in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-24) score. After 6 weeks of blinded treatment, improvement in the least-squares mean (SE) HAM-D-24 scores were similar between the active (-11.1 [2.03]) and sham groups (-10.6 [2.00]; P = 0.8; difference [95% CI], - 0.5 [-4.2 to 3.3]). Response rates were 41.7% in the active group and 36.4% in the sham group (P = 0.6). Remission rates were 29.2% in the active group and 29.0% in the sham group (P = 0.95). There were no new tolerability or safety signals in adolescents. Although TMS treatment produced a clinically meaningful change in depressive symptom severity, this did not differ from sham treatment. Future studies should focus on strategies to reduce the placebo response and examine the optimal dosing of TMS for adolescents with TRD.

Indexed as

Depressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantMajor Depressive DisorderAdolescentDepressionDouble-Blind MethodHumansPrefrontal CortexTranscranial Magnetic StimulationTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID32919400
PMCPMC7852515
OpenAlexW3084804919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.