Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32919397›Full record

SynthesisPediatric research2021

Exhaled volatile organic compounds analysis in clinical pediatrics: a systematic review.

Rosa A Sola Martínez, José M Pastor Hernández, Óscar Yanes Torrado, Manuel Cánovas Díaz, Teresa de Diego Puente, María Vinaixa Crevillent

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pediatric research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Volatile organic breath components and exercise induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic children.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rosa A Sola MartínezDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (B) and Immunology, University of Murcia and Murcian Institute of Biosanitary Research Virgen de la Arrixaca (IMIB), Murcia, Spain.
José M Pastor HernándezDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (B) and Immunology, University of Murcia and Murcian Institute of Biosanitary Research Virgen de la Arrixaca (IMIB), Murcia, Spain.
Óscar Yanes TorradoDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain.
Manuel Cánovas DíazDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (B) and Immunology, University of Murcia and Murcian Institute of Biosanitary Research Virgen de la Arrixaca (IMIB), Murcia, Spain.
Teresa de Diego PuenteDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (B) and Immunology, University of Murcia and Murcian Institute of Biosanitary Research Virgen de la Arrixaca (IMIB), Murcia, Spain. tdp@um.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3501-5483
María Vinaixa CrevillentDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeasured exhaled volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in breath also referred to as exhaled volatilome have been long claimed as a potential source of non-invasive and clinically applicable biomarkers. However, the feasibility of using exhaled volatilome in clinical practice remains to be demonstrated, particularly in pediatrics where the need for improved non-invasive diagnostic and monitoring methods is most urgent. This work presents the first formal evidence-based judgment of the clinical potential of breath volatilome in the pediatric population.

methodsA rigorous systematic review across Web of Science, SCOPUS, and PubMed databases following the PRISMA statement guidelines. A narrative synthesis of the evidence was conducted and QUADAS-2 was used to assess the quality of selected studies.

resultsTwo independent reviewers deemed 22 out of the 229 records initially found to satisfy inclusion criteria. A summary of breath VOCs found to be relevant for several respiratory, infectious, and metabolic pathologies was conducted. In addition, we assessed their associated metabolism coverage through a functional characterization analysis.

conclusionOur results indicate that current research remains stagnant in a preclinical exploratory setting. Designing exploratory experiments in compliance with metabolomics practice should drive forward the clinical translation of VOCs breath analysis. IMPACT: What is the key message of your article? Metabolomics practice could help to achieve the clinical utility of exhaled volatilome analysis. What does it add to the existing literature? This work is the first systematic review focused on disease status discrimination using analysis of exhaled breath in the pediatric population. A summary of the reported exhaled volatile organic compounds is conducted together with a functional characterization analysis. What is the impact? Having noted challenges preventing the clinical translation, we summary metabolomics practices and the experimental designs that are closer to clinical practice to create a framework to guide future trials.

Indexed as

PediatricsBreath TestsChildExhalationHumansMetabolomicsVolatile Organic CompoundsVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.