SynthesisPediatric research2021
Exhaled volatile organic compounds analysis in clinical pediatrics: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Pediatric research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disposable Face Masks for Noninvasive Drug Detection: A Proof-of-Concept Study with Cough Syrup Constituents.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Impact of environmental exposures on exhaled breath and lung function: NELA Birth Cohort.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- External Validation of Potential Breath Biomarkers for Asthma: A Step Forward Toward the Clinical Implementation of Breath Analysis.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024Article
- Breath Volatile Organic Compounds in Surveillance of Gastric Cancer Patients following Radical Surgical Management.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Relationship between lung function and exhaled volatile organic compounds in healthy infants.Pediatric pulmonology · 2022Article
- Volatile organic breath components and exercise induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic children.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2021Article
- Disposable Paper-Based Biosensors for the Point-of-Care Detection of Hazardous Contaminations-A Review.Biosensors · 2021Review
- Increased day-to-day fluctuations in exhaled breath profiles after a rhinovirus challenge in asthma.Allergy · 2021Article
- Exhaled volatilome analysis as a useful tool to discriminate asthma with other coexisting atopic diseases in women of childbearing age.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Review
- Data preprocessing workflow for exhaled breath analysis by GC/MS using open sources.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Volatile Organic Compounds Produced by Human Pathogenic Fungi Are Toxic toFrontiers in fungal biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMeasured exhaled volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in breath also referred to as exhaled volatilome have been long claimed as a potential source of non-invasive and clinically applicable biomarkers. However, the feasibility of using exhaled volatilome in clinical practice remains to be demonstrated, particularly in pediatrics where the need for improved non-invasive diagnostic and monitoring methods is most urgent. This work presents the first formal evidence-based judgment of the clinical potential of breath volatilome in the pediatric population.
methodsA rigorous systematic review across Web of Science, SCOPUS, and PubMed databases following the PRISMA statement guidelines. A narrative synthesis of the evidence was conducted and QUADAS-2 was used to assess the quality of selected studies.
resultsTwo independent reviewers deemed 22 out of the 229 records initially found to satisfy inclusion criteria. A summary of breath VOCs found to be relevant for several respiratory, infectious, and metabolic pathologies was conducted. In addition, we assessed their associated metabolism coverage through a functional characterization analysis.
conclusionOur results indicate that current research remains stagnant in a preclinical exploratory setting. Designing exploratory experiments in compliance with metabolomics practice should drive forward the clinical translation of VOCs breath analysis. IMPACT: What is the key message of your article? Metabolomics practice could help to achieve the clinical utility of exhaled volatilome analysis. What does it add to the existing literature? This work is the first systematic review focused on disease status discrimination using analysis of exhaled breath in the pediatric population. A summary of the reported exhaled volatile organic compounds is conducted together with a functional characterization analysis. What is the impact? Having noted challenges preventing the clinical translation, we summary metabolomics practices and the experimental designs that are closer to clinical practice to create a framework to guide future trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32919397What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.