Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32919090›Full record

ArticleBrain stimulation

Entrainment of cerebellar purkinje cells with directional AC electric fields in anesthetized rats.

Ahmet S Asan, Eric J Lang, Mesut Sahin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain stimulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. tACS of the Cerebellum and the Motor Cortex Entrains the Spiking Activity of the Cells in Motor Thalamus in a Frequency Dependent Manner.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ahmet S AsanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, University Heights, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA.
Eric J LangDepartment of Neuroscience and Physiology, New York University School of Medicine, Science Building, New York, NY, 07102, USA.
Mesut SahinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, University Heights, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA. Electronic address: sahin@njit.edu.
New Jersey Institute of Technology · USNew York University · US

Funding

Underlying Mechanisms of Cerebellar tDCSR21NS101386 · NINDS · NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI SAHIN, MESUT · 2018 to 2019
$457k
Electrical and Ultrasonic Modulation of Lateral Cerebellar NucleusR21NS125349 · NINDS · NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI SAHIN, MESUT · 2021 to 2021
$217k
NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS101386NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS125349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranscranial electrical stimulation (tES) shows promise to treat neurological disorders. Knowledge of how the orthogonal components of the electric field (E-field) alter neuronal activity is required for strategic placement of transcranial electrodes. Yet, essentially no information exists on this relationship for mammalian cerebellum in vivo, despite the cerebellum being a target for clinical tES studies.

objectiveTo characterize how cerebellar Purkinje cell (PC) activity varies with the intensity, frequency, and direction of applied AC and DC E-fields.

methodsExtracellular recordings were obtained from vermis lobule 7 PCs in anesthetized rats. AC (2-100 Hz) or DC E-fields were generated in a range of intensities (0.75-30 mV/mm) in three orthogonal directions. Field-evoked PC simple spike activity was characterized in terms of firing rate modulation and phase-locking as a function of these parameters. t-tests were used for statistical comparisons.

resultsThe effect of applied E-fields was direction and intensity dependent, with rostrocaudally directed fields causing stronger modulations than dorsoventral fields and mediolaterally directed ones causing little to no effect, on average. The directionality dependent modulation suggests that PC is the primary cell type affected the most by electric stimulation, and this effect was probably given rise by a large dendritic tree and a soma. AC stimulation entrained activity in a frequency dependent manner, with stronger phase-locking to the stimulus cycle at higher frequencies. DC fields produced a modulation consisting of strong transients at current onset and offset with an intervening plateau.

conclusionOrientation of the exogenous E-field critically determines the modulation depth of cerebellar cortical output. With properly oriented fields, PC simple spike activity can strongly be entrained by AC fields, overriding the spontaneous firing pattern.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnesthetics, DissociativeAnesthetics, InhalationAnimalsCerebellumMaleNeuronsPurkinje CellsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAnesthetics, DissociativeAnesthetics, InhalationCerebellar modulationElectrical stimulationSpike entrainmentTranscranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

Identifiers

PMID32919090
PMCPMC7722055
OpenAlexW3084009508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.