Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32919043›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2020

Accelerated training of bootstrap aggregation-based deep information extraction systems from cancer pathology reports.

Hong-Jun Yoon, Hilda B Klasky, John P Gounley, Mohammed Alawad, Shang Gao, Eric B Durbin, Xiao-Cheng Wu, Antoinette Stroup, Jennifer Doherty, Linda Coyle and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Assigning ICD-O-3 Codes to Pathology Reports using Neural Multi-Task Training with Hierarchical Regularization.ACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Hong-Jun YoonComputational Sciences and Engineering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, United States of America. Electronic address: yoonh@ornl.gov.
Hilda B KlaskyComputational Sciences and Engineering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, United States of America. Electronic address: klaskyhb@ornl.gov.
John P GounleyComputational Sciences and Engineering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, United States of America. Electronic address: gounleyjp@ornl.gov.
Mohammed AlawadComputational Sciences and Engineering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, United States of America. Electronic address: alawadmm@ornl.gov.
Shang GaoComputational Sciences and Engineering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, United States of America. Electronic address: gaos@ornl.gov.
Eric B DurbinCollege of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, United States of America. Electronic address: ericd@kcr.uky.edu.
Xiao-Cheng WuLouisiana Tumor Registry, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, School of Public Health, New Orleans, LA 70112, United States of America. Electronic address: XWu@lsuhsc.edu.
Antoinette StroupNew Jersey State Cancer Registry, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, United States of America. Electronic address: nan.stroup@rutgers.edu.
Jennifer DohertyUtah Cancer Registry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, United States of America. Electronic address: Jen.Doherty@hci.utah.edu.
Linda CoyleInformation Management Services Inc., Calverton, MD 20705, United States of America. Electronic address: coylel@imsweb.com.
Lynne PenberthySurveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States of America. Electronic address: lynnepenberthy.schumacher-penberthy@nih.gov.
J Blair ChristianComputational Sciences and Engineering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, United States of America. Electronic address: christianjb@ornl.gov.
Georgia D TourassiNational Center for Computational Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, United States of America. Electronic address: tourassig@ornl.gov.

Funding

UTAH REGIONAL CANCER CENTERP30CA042014 · NCI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI KATHARINE S ULLMAN · 1986 to 2026
$72.6M
University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center Support Grant ECIA SupplementP30CA177558 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI Bernard Mark Evers · 2013 to 2026
$38.3M
POLICY & ENVIRONMENTAL APPROACHES & COMMUNITY-CLINICAL LINKAGES IN CANCER PROGRAMU58DP003907 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI TUCKER, THOMAS C · 2012 to 2014
$3.8M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U58 DP003907NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201300021CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800007CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800013CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800013INCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800016CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800016INCI NIH HHS P30 CA177558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn machine learning, it is evident that the classification of the task performance increases if bootstrap aggregation (bagging) is applied. However, the bagging of deep neural networks takes tremendous amounts of computational resources and training time. The research question that we aimed to answer in this research is whether we could achieve higher task performance scores and accelerate the training by dividing a problem into sub-problems. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe data used in this study consist of free text from electronic cancer pathology reports. We applied bagging and partitioned data training using Multi-Task Convolutional Neural Network (MT-CNN) and Multi-Task Hierarchical Convolutional Attention Network (MT-HCAN) classifiers. We split a big problem into 20 sub-problems, resampled the training cases 2,000 times, and trained the deep learning model for each bootstrap sample and each sub-problem-thus, generating up to 40,000 models. We performed the training of many models concurrently in a high-performance computing environment at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL).

resultsWe demonstrated that aggregation of the models improves task performance compared with the single-model approach, which is consistent with other research studies; and we demonstrated that the two proposed partitioned bagging methods achieved higher classification accuracy scores on four tasks. Notably, the improvements were significant for the extraction of cancer histology data, which had more than 500 class labels in the task; these results show that data partition may alleviate the complexity of the task. On the contrary, the methods did not achieve superior scores for the tasks of site and subsite classification. Intrinsically, since data partitioning was based on the primary cancer site, the accuracy depended on the determination of the partitions, which needs further investigation and improvement.

conclusionResults in this research demonstrate that 1. The data partitioning and bagging strategy achieved higher performance scores. 2. We achieved faster training leveraged by the high-performance Summit supercomputer at ORNL.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsNeural Networks, ComputerComputing MethodologiesHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalMachine LearningBootstrap aggregationConvolutional neural networksData partitioningDeep learningHierarchical self-attention networksHigh-performance computingNatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID32919043
PMCPMC8276580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.