Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32918782›Full record

ArticleCell proliferation2020

Acquisition of chromosome 1q duplication in parental and genome-edited human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neural stem cells results in their higher proliferation rate in vitro and in vivo.

Narges Zare Mehrjardi, Marek Molcanyi, Firuze Fulya Hatay, Marco Timmer, Ebrahim Shahbazi, Justus P Ackermann, Stefan Herms, Stefanie Heilmann-Heimbach, Thomas F Wunderlich, Nora Prochnow and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell proliferation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Genes as Genome Stabilizers in Pluripotent Stem Cells.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Narges Zare MehrjardiCenter for Physiology and Pathophysiology, Institute for Neurophysiology, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Marek MolcanyiCenter for Physiology and Pathophysiology, Institute for Neurophysiology, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Firuze Fulya HatayCenter for Physiology and Pathophysiology, Institute for Neurophysiology, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Marco TimmerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Ebrahim ShahbaziDepartment of Stem Cells and Developmental Biology, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Justus P AckermannCenter for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Stefan HermsDepartment of Genomics, Life & Brain Center, Institute for Human Genetics, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Stefanie Heilmann-HeimbachDepartment of Genomics, Life & Brain Center, Institute for Human Genetics, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Thomas F WunderlichCenter for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Nora ProchnowClinic for Neurology, St. Josef-Hospital, Clinic of the Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Aiden HaghikiaClinic for Neurology, St. Josef-Hospital, Clinic of the Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Angelika LampertInstitute of Physiology, Uniklinik, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Jürgen HeschelerCenter for Physiology and Pathophysiology, Institute for Neurophysiology, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Edmund A M NeugebauerMedizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane, Campus Neuruppin, Neuruppin, Germany.
Hossein BaharvandDepartment of Stem Cells and Developmental Biology, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Tomo ŠarićCenter for Physiology and Pathophysiology, Institute for Neurophysiology, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8344-1095
University of Cologne · DESt. Josef-Hospital · DEUniversity of Bonn · DEMedizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane · DERoyan Institute · IRUniversitätsklinikum Aachen · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEUniversity of Science and Culture · IR

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft NE 385/21-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SA 1382/7-1Köln Fortune ProgrammRoyan Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesGenetic engineering of human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neural stem cells (hiPSC-NSC) may increase the risk of genomic aberrations. Therefore, we asked whether genetic modification of hiPSC-NSCs exacerbates chromosomal abnormalities that may occur during passaging and whether they may cause any functional perturbations in NSCs in vitro and in vivo. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe transgenic cassette was inserted into the AAVS1 locus, and the genetic integrity of zinc-finger nuclease (ZFN)-modified hiPSC-NSCs was assessed by the SNP-based karyotyping. The hiPSC-NSC proliferation was assessed in vitro by the EdU incorporation assay and in vivo by staining of brain slices with Ki-67 antibody at 2 and 8 weeks after transplantation of ZFN-NSCs with and without chromosomal aberration into the striatum of immunodeficient rats.

resultsDuring early passages, no chromosomal abnormalities were detected in unmodified or ZFN-modified hiPSC-NSCs. However, at higher passages both cell populations acquired duplication of the entire long arm of chromosome 1, dup(1)q. ZNF-NSCs carrying dup(1)q exhibited higher proliferation rate than karyotypically intact cells, which was partly mediated by increased expression of AKT3 located on Chr1q. Compared to karyotypically normal ZNF-NSCs, cells with dup(1)q also exhibited increased proliferation in vivo 2 weeks, but not 2 months, after transplantation.

conclusionsThese results demonstrate that, independently of ZFN-editing, hiPSC-NSCs have a propensity for acquiring dup(1)q and this aberration results in increased proliferation which might compromise downstream hiPSC-NSC applications.

Indexed as

BrainCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCells, CulturedChromosomes, Human, Pair 1Gene DuplicationGene EditingGenetic VectorsHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsKaryotypeNeural Stem CellsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktZinc FingersAKT3 protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktAAVS1cell-based therapychromosome aberrationsdifferentiationduplicationgenome editingneuronsregenerative medicinetransplantationzinc-finger nuclease

Identifiers

PMID32918782
PMCPMC7574866
OpenAlexW3084995603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.