Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32918720›Full record

ArticleAmbio2020

Multi-functional benefits from targeted set-aside land in a Danish catchment.

Fatemeh Hashemi, Brian Kronvang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fatemeh HashemiDepartment of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Vejlsøvej 25, 8600, Silkeborg, Denmark. fh@bios.au.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4756-9339
Brian KronvangDepartment of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Vejlsøvej 25, 8600, Silkeborg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1165-1354

Funding

Nordforsk Project Number 82263
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we explored how a targeted land use change in a Danish catchment (River Odense) may provide multi-functional benefits through nitrogen (N)-load reductions to obtain good ecological quality in Odense estuary, protection of N-vulnerable groundwater aquifers, protection of Natura2000 sites and carbon sequestration. An N-load model linked to GIS thematic layers of known protected areas (Natura2000 sites and N-vulnerable groundwater aquifers) was utilised targeting high N-load areas to locate set-aside land. The achieved multi-functional benefits within the catchment and estuary were assessed and cost-benefit assessment was performed by dividing the total welfare costs of the set-aside by the total multi-functional benefits gained from each strategy. The results show that obtaining multi-functional benefits at the lowest cost requires a targeted shift of set-aside from the traditional hot-spot N-load areas to designated protected areas.

Indexed as

GroundwaterAgricultureDenmarkEnvironmental MonitoringNitrogenRiversWater Pollutants, ChemicalNitrogenWater Pollutants, ChemicalDiffuse water pollutionMulti-functional benefitsNitrogen load reductionTargeted land use change

Identifiers

PMID32918720
PMCPMC7502650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.