Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32918709›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2020

Epidemiology of bovine cysticercosis and associated economic losses in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Deise Janice Henckel, Vinicius Cardoso Comin, Henrique Meiroz de Souza Almeida, Luis Antonio Mathias, Gabriel Augusto Marques Rossi

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Deise Janice HenckelFaculdade Qualittas, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Vinicius Cardoso CominCentro Universitário Central Paulista (UNICEP), São Carlos, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3191-5492
Henrique Meiroz de Souza AlmeidaSão Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7631-4271
Luis Antonio MathiasSão Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7282-3071
Gabriel Augusto Marques RossiFaculdade Qualittas, Porto Alegre, Brazil. gabrielrossiveterinario@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7967-7628
Centro Universitário Central Paulista · BRUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bovine cysticercosis (BCC) is the most frequently detected zoonosis in Brazilian slaughterhouses and is considered a problem for public health and beef production chain, requiring epidemiological studies focusing on evaluating its prevalence, spatial distribution, and economic losses in order to improve and adopt specific strategies for BCC control. Thus, this study focused to establish BCC prevalence and spatial distribution in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, and estimate the economic losses for cattle farmers suppliers of one exporter slaughterhouse. A set of 70,591 bovine carcasses were postmortem inspected from 2019 to 2020, which came from 134 municipalities located in eight distinct regions in the state of Rio Grande do Sul. The prevalence found was 3.44% (C.I. 95% 3.30-3.57%), and animals infected with unviable cysticerci were more frequently detected (70.56%) than those carrying viable ones (29.44%). The most frequent destination of carcasses and viscera was non-export (65.48%), followed by freezing/salting (25.41%), heat treatment (8.74%), and rendering (0.37%), resulting in a total economic burden of at least US$ 167,868.53 for cattle farmers. Some regions had higher risk for BCC occurrence, such as Porto Alegre, Caxias do Sul, Santa Maria, Ijuí, and Passo Fundo (OR > 1, p < 0.05), respectively. These results highlight the need of adopting prophylactic measures, mainly in specific areas, in order to control BCC and reduce the economic losses for beef production chain.

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesCysticercosisTaenia saginataAbattoirsAnimalsBrazilCattleEpidemiologyGISMeat inspectionParasitologyTaenia saginataZoonosis

Identifiers

PMID32918709
OpenAlexW3085410217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.