ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2021
Microvascular grafting to enhance perfusion in colonic long-segment oesophageal reconstruction.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Colonic interposition in esophagectomy: an ACS-NSQIP study.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Distal-continual colon interposition for esophageal reconstruction after esophagectomy: Two case reports.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOesophagectomy with long-segment colon reconstruction is the first-line treatment when the stomach is not available. Supercharging of the newly formed conduit can improve vascular function utilizing intraoperative perfusion imaging system, following thoracoscopic oesophagectomy for distal-oesophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer. The purpose of this study is to examine the safety and efficacy of microvascular augmentation of left colonic interposition following oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.
methodsA retrospective analysis of 156 consecutive oesophagectomies between January 2016 and July 2018 was performed. All oesophagectomies involving left colon interposition with microvascular augmentation were included in the study. In all cases, oesophageal mobilization was performed thoracoscopically in prone position and the left colon was used as neo-oesophagus in an isoperistaltic fashion. Conduit perfusion was assessed with the Spy system and neck supercharging was performed using microsurgical technique.
resultsA total of n = 5 (3.2%) patients were identified. Two cases had delayed and 3 had immediate reconstruction. The conduit was microsurgically augmented in 3 cases with both venous and arterial anastomoses (supercharging) and in 2 cases with venous anastomosis only (superdrainage). No anastomotic leak was identified. One case developed left recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy with associated aspiration pneumonia.
conclusionsSupercharged colonic interposition is a safe way of oesophageal reconstruction when long-segment interposition graft is needed. In oesophageal cancer and in the absence of a viable stomach with intact gastroepiploic arcade, it should be considered a feasible option with favourable outcomes, when the expertise and facilities are available. Use of intraoperative perfusion imaging reveals improved conduit blood supply post-supercharging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.