ArticleBrain structure & function2020
Minimizing shrinkage of acute brain slices using metal spacers during histological embedding.
Article in Brain structure & function, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spatial Organization of Morpho-Electric Subtypes of Pyramidal Neuron in the Subiculum.Hippocampus · 2026Article
- Electrophysiological classification of human layer 2-3 pyramidal neurons reveals subtype-specific synaptic interactions.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- GABAFrontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2025Article
- Lifelong absence of microglia alters hippocampal glutamatergic networks but not synapse and spine density.EMBO reports · 2024Article
- Cell-type specific inhibitory plasticity in subicular pyramidal cells.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2024Article
- CACTUS: a computational framework for generating realistic white matter microstructure substrates.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2023Article
- Fluorescence Imaging of 3D Cell Models with Subcellular Resolution.Bio-protocol · 2022Article
- Interneuron diversity in the rat dentate gyrus: An unbiased in vitro classification.Hippocampus · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The morphological structure of neurons provides the basis for their functions and is a major focus of contemporary neuroscience studies. Intracellular staining of single cells in acute slices is a well-established approach, offering high-resolution information on neuronal morphology, complementing their physiology. Despite major technical advances, however, a common histological artifact often precludes precise morphological analysis: shrinkage of the sampled tissue after embedding for microscopy. Here, we describe a new approach using a metal spacer, sandwiched between two coverslips to reduce shrinkage of whole-mount slice preparations during embedding with aqueous mounting medium under a coverslip. This approach additionally allows imaging the slices from both sides to obtain better quality images of deeper structures. We demonstrate that the use of this spacer system can efficiently and stably reduce the shrinkage of slices, whereas conventional embedding methods without spacer or with agar spacer cause severe, progressive shrinkage after embedding. We further show that the shrinkage of slices is not uniform and artifacts in morphology and anatomical parameters produced cannot be compensated using linear correction algorithms. Our study, thus, emphasizes the importance of preventing the deformation of slice preparations and offers an effective means for reducing shrinkage and associated artifacts during embedding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.