Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2020
Intra-individual physiological response of recreational runners to different training mesocycles: a randomized cross-over study.
Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Kinetics of submaximal DFA α1 prior and post maximal efforts in trained and highly trained male and female cyclists.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- Impact of weekly frequency of high-intensity interval training on cardiorespiratory, metabolic, and performance measures in recreational runners - An exploratory study.Physiological reports · 2025Article
- A Flexible Training Approach to Improving Concurrent Training Outcomes in Remote Trainees.International journal of exercise science · 2025Article
- ChatGPT Generated Training Plans for Runners are not Rated Optimal by Coaching Experts, but Increase in Quality with Additional Input Information.Journal of sports science & medicine · 2024Article
- Assessment of Peak Oxygen Uptake with a Smartwatch and its Usefulness for Training of Runners.International journal of sports medicine · 2022Article
- Proof-of-concept and concurrent validity of a prototype headset to assess peak oxygen uptake without a face mask.BMC research notes · 2022Article
- Slow and Steady, or Hard and Fast? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Comparing Body Composition Changes between Interval Training and Moderate Intensity Continuous Training.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePronounced differences in individual physiological adaptation may occur following various training mesocycles in runners. Here we aimed to assess the individual changes in performance and physiological adaptation of recreational runners performing mesocycles with different intensity, duration and frequency.
methodsEmploying a randomized cross-over design, the intra-individual physiological responses [i.e., peak ([Formula: see text]) and submaximal ([Formula: see text]) oxygen uptake, velocity at lactate thresholds (V
results[Formula: see text], V
conclusionOn a group level, none of the interventions altered [Formula: see text], V
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.