Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32918448›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of public health2021

Current state of scientific evidence on Internet-based interventions for the treatment of depression, anxiety, eating disorders and substance abuse: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

C Barr Taylor, Andrea K Graham, Rachael E Flatt, Karin Waldherr, Ellen E Fitzsimmons-Craft

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. A randomized controlled trial of a smartphone-based application for the treatment of anxiety.Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research · 2021
    Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

C Barr TaylorCenter for m2Health, Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Andrea K GrahamDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Rachael E FlattCenter for m2Health, Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Karin WaldherrFernFH Distance Learning University of Applied Sciences, Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Ellen E Fitzsimmons-CraftDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Stanford University · USFachhochschule Wiener Neustadt · ATNorthwestern University · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Harnessing Mobile Technology to Reduce Mental Health Disorders in College PopulationsR01MH115128 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EISENBERG, DANIEL, NEWMAN, MICHELLE G · 2018 to 2022
$4.1M
Using Technology to Improve Eating Disorders TreatmentR01MH100455 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TAYLOR, CRAIG BARR, WILFLEY, DENISE ELLA · 2013 to 2017
$3.4M
Developing an Optimized Conversational Agent or "Chatbot" to Facilitate Mental Health Services Use in Individuals with Eating DisordersK08MH120341 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI FITZSIMMONS-CRAFT, ELLEN E. · 2019 to 2023
$824k
Testing Intervention Strategies for Addressing Obesity and Binge EatingK01DK116925 · NIDDK · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GRAHAM, ANDREA KASS · 2018 to 2022
$799k
NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK116925NIMH NIH HHS K08 MH120341NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100455NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH115128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundICare represents a consortium of European Investigators examining the effects of online mental health care for a variety of common mental health disorders provided in a variety of settings. This article provides an overview of the evidence of effectiveness for Internet-based treatment for four common mental health disorders that are the focus of much of this work: depression, anxiety, substance abuse and eating disorders.

methodsThe overview focused primarily on systematic reviews and meta-analyses identified through PubMed (Ovid) and other databases and published in English. Given the large number of reviews specific to depression, anxiety, substance abuse and/or eating disorders, we did not focus on reviews that examined the effects of Internet-based interventions on mental health disorders in general. Each article was reviewed and summarized by one of the senior authors, and this review was then reviewed by the other senior authors. We did not address issues of prevention, cost-effectiveness, implementation or dissemination, as these are addressed in other reviews in this supplement.

resultsAcross Internet-based intervention studies addressing depression, anxiety, substance abuse and eating disorders primarily among adults, almost all reviews and meta-analyses found that these interventions successfully reduce symptoms and are efficacious treatments. Generally, effect sizes for Internet-based interventions treating eating disorders and substance abuse are lower compared with interventions for depression and anxiety.

conclusionsGiven the effectiveness of Internet-based interventions to reduce symptoms of these common mental health disorders, efforts are needed to examine issues of how they can be best disseminated and implemented in a variety of health care and other settings.

Indexed as

Feeding and Eating DisordersInternet-Based InterventionSubstance-Related DisordersAdultAnxietyDepressionHumansSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID32918448
PMCPMC8495688
OpenAlexW3085610539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.