Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32918441›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2020

Use of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC) Combined with Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration (LCBDE): A Cohort Study.

Nannan Zhang, Gang Wu, Yuanhang Zhou, Zhiwei Liao, Jinxing Guo, Yongjun Liu, Qi Huang, Xiaodong Li

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nannan ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, Baoshan Branch of Huashan North Courtyard Affiliated to Fudan University, (Renhe Hospital, Baoshan District, Shanghai), Shanghai, China (mainland).
Gang WuDepartment of General Surgery, Baoshan Branch of Huashan North Courtyard Affiliated to Fudan University, (Renhe Hospital, Baoshan District, Shanghai), Shanghai, China (mainland).
Yuanhang ZhouDepartment of General Surgery, Baoshan Branch of Huashan North Courtyard Affiliated to Fudan University, (Renhe Hospital, Baoshan District, Shanghai), Shanghai, China (mainland).
Zhiwei LiaoDepartment of General Surgery, Baoshan Branch of Huashan North Courtyard Affiliated to Fudan University, (Renhe Hospital, Baoshan District, Shanghai), Shanghai, China (mainland).
Jinxing GuoDepartment of General Surgery, Baoshan Branch of Huashan North Courtyard Affiliated to Fudan University, (Renhe Hospital, Baoshan District, Shanghai), Shanghai, China (mainland).
Yongjun LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Baoshan Branch of Huashan North Courtyard Affiliated to Fudan University, (Renhe Hospital, Baoshan District, Shanghai), Shanghai, China (mainland).
Qi HuangDepartment of General Surgery, Baoshan Branch of Huashan North Courtyard Affiliated to Fudan University, (Renhe Hospital, Baoshan District, Shanghai), Shanghai, China (mainland).
Xiaodong LiDepartment of General Surgery, Baoshan Branch of Huashan North Courtyard Affiliated to Fudan University, (Renhe Hospital, Baoshan District, Shanghai), Shanghai, China (mainland).
Huashan Hospital · CNFudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND The have been few reports on use of ERAS in LC combined with LCBDE to promote postoperative recovery of patients. Therefore, the purpose of this cohort study was to explore the use of ERAS in patients who underwent LC combined with LCBDE. MATERIAL AND METHODS We collected clinical data of 445 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration from January 2015 to February 2019 in our hospital and divided the patients into an E-LC group and an LC group. The stress response index, postoperative complication rate, and postoperative rehabilitation effect of the 2 groups were compared and analyzed. RESULTS The WBC count and CRP levels in the E-LC group were significantly lower than those of the LC group 1 day after surgery (p<0.05). In terms of the postoperative complications, the incidence of nausea, incisional pain, and vomiting in the E-LC group were lower than in the LC group, and the differences were statistically significant (p<0.05). In terms of the postoperative rehabilitation efficacy, flatus time and length of hospital stay after surgery in the E-LC group were significantly shorter than those in the LC group (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Use of ERAS in the perioperative period in patients who underwent LC combined with LCBDE reduces the stress response and postoperative complications and accelerates postoperative rehabilitation.

Indexed as

Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicCohort StudiesCommon Bile DuctFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32918441
PMCPMC7510172
OpenAlexW3085758362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.