Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32918372›Full record

ArticlePhysiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy2021

Patient values in physiotherapy practice, a qualitative study.

Carla M Bastemeijer, Johannes P van Ewijk, Jan A Hazelzet, Lennard P Voogt

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Physiotherapy Training Program Defects in Geriatrics: A Qualitative Study.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carla M BastemeijerDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2161-7379
Johannes P van EwijkUniversity of Humanistic Studies, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jan A HazelzetDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Lennard P VoogtDepartment of Physical Therapy Studies, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLRotterdam University of Applied Sciences · NLUniversity of Humanistic Studies · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPhysiotherapy is, like all healthcare professions, relational and value-laden. Patient-centred care, evidence-based practice and value-based practices are concepts in which patient values lie at the heart of high-quality healthcare practices. Nevertheless, physiotherapists have limited awareness of what patient values are in the physiotherapy encounter. The purpose of this study is to explore these patient values.

methodsA qualitative study design using content analysis was used involving 17 adult participants with chronic or recurrent musculoskeletal pain. Data were collected during July 2015-July 2016 in three primary care physiotherapy facilities in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Two researchers analysed the interviews and derived relevant codes from the data. After an iterative process of comparing, analysing, conceptualizing, and discussing the data, a pre-existing analytic framework was refined in which distinct values were delineated.

resultsEmerging patient values were encompassed in three themes, each consisting of two to four elements: (1) values about oneself (uniqueness and autonomy), (2) values regarding actions of the professional (technically skilled professional, conscientious professional, compassionate professional, responsive professional) and (3) values regarding interactions between patients and the professionals (partnership and empowerment).

conclusionThis study emphasizes the need for discussing patient values in the clinical encounter and helps physiotherapists to understand what deems to be important for patients with musculoskeletal pain in physiotherapy practice. The results of this study contribute to the existing body of knowledge of this important aspect of the quality of physiotherapy practice and may inspire clinicians and educators to actively implement patient values in clinical practice and the physiotherapy education.

Indexed as

Physical TherapistsProfessional-Patient RelationsAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelHumansNetherlandsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesQualitative Researchpatient-centred carepatient preferenceprimary healthcareprofessional-patient relationsqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID32918372
PMCPMC7900966
OpenAlexW3086496186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.