ReviewJournal of applied genetics2020
Genetic modifiers and phenotypic variability in neuromuscular disorders.
Review in Journal of applied genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Decoding Neuromuscular Disorders: The Complex Role of Genetic and Epigenetic Regulators.Genes · 2025Review
- A study concept of expeditious clinical enrollment for genetic modifier studies in Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy 1A.Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS · 2024Article
- Seroprevalence of binding and neutralizing antibodies against 18 adeno-associated virus types in patients with neuromuscular disorders.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Article
- The Presentation of Two Unrelated Clinical Cases from the Republic of North Ossetia-Alania with the Same Previously Undescribed Variant in theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuromuscular disorders are mostly rare diseases with autosomal dominant, recessive, or X-linked inheritance. Interestingly, among patients carrying the same mutations, a range of phenotypic severity is reported. This phenotypic variability in neuromuscular disorders is still not fully understood. This review will focus on genetic modifiers and will briefly describe metabolic pathways, in which they are involved. Genetic modifiers are variants in the same or other genes that modulate the phenotype. Proteins encoded by genetic modifiers in neuromuscular diseases are taking part in different metabolic processes, most commonly in inflammation, growth and regeneration, endoplasmic reticulum metabolism, and cytoskeletal activities. Recent advances in omics technologies, development of computational algorithms, and establishing large international consortia intensified discovery sped up investigation of genetic modifiers. As more individuals affected by neuromuscular disorders are tested, it is often suggested that classic models of genetic causation cannot explain phenotypic variability. There is a growing interest in their discovery and identifying shared metabolic pathways can contribute to design targeted therapies. We provide an update on variants acting as genetic modifiers in neuromuscular disorders and strategies used for their discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.