Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32918198›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2020

Concerns of Primary Care Clinicians Practicing in an Integrated Health System: a Qualitative Study.

Ekaterina Anderson, Amanda K Solch, B Graeme Fincke, Mark Meterko, Jolie B Wormwood, Varsha G Vimalananda

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ekaterina AndersonCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Bedford VA Medical Center, Bedford, MA, USA. ekaterina.anderson@va.gov.ORCID 0000-0001-7109-3054
Amanda K SolchCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Bedford VA Medical Center, Bedford, MA, USA.
B Graeme FinckeCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Bedford VA Medical Center, Bedford, MA, USA.
Mark MeterkoVHA Office of Reporting, Analytics, Performance, Improvement and Deployment (RAPID), Bedford, MA, USA.
Jolie B WormwoodCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Bedford VA Medical Center, Bedford, MA, USA.
Varsha G VimalanandaCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Bedford VA Medical Center, Bedford, MA, USA.
Bedford VA Research Corporation · USBoston University · USUniversity of New Hampshire · US

Funding

Measuring and improving specialty care coordination in VAIK2HX002137 · VA · EDITH NOURSE ROGERS MEMORIAL VETERANS HOSPITAL · PI VIMALANANDA, VARSHA · 2018 to 2022
–
HSRD VA Career Development Award 5IK2HX002137-02 for Dr. Varsha VimalanandaHSRD VA IK2 HX002137
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinician well-being is a major priority for healthcare organizations. However, the impact of workplace environment on clinicians' well-being is poorly understood. Integrated health systems are a particularly relevant type of practice environment to focus on, given the increasing rates of practice consolidation and integration.

objectiveTo improve understanding of the concerns of primary care clinicians (PCCs) practicing in an integrated health system.

designWe analyzed free-text comment box responses offered on a national survey about care coordination by 555 PCCs in the Veterans Health Administration, one of the largest integrated health systems in the USA.

participantsA total of 555 PCCs who left free-text comments on a national survey of care coordination in the VHA (30% out of 1862 eligible respondents). Demographics and coordination scale scores were similar between respondents who left comments vs. those who did not. APPROACH: The data were coded and analyzed in line with the grounded theory approach. Key themes were identified by team consensus and illustrative quotations were chosen to illustrate each theme. KEY

resultsVHA PCCs described some pressures shared across practice environments, such as prohibitive administrative burden, but also reported several concerns particular to integrated settings, including "dumping" by specialists and moral distress related to a concern for patients. Frustrations due to several aspects of responsibility around referrals may be unique to integrated health systems with salaried clinicians and/or where specialists have the ability to reject referrals.

conclusionPCCs in integrated health systems feel many of the same pressures as their counterparts in non-integrated settings, but they are also confronted with unique stressors related to these systems' organizational features that restrict clinicians' autonomy. An understanding of these concerns can guide efforts to improve the well-being of PCCs in existing integrated health systems, as well as in practices on their way to integration.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedPrimary Health CareGovernment ProgramsHumansQualitative ResearchReferral and Consultationclinician well-beingintegrated health systemsprimary careVeterans

Identifiers

PMID32918198
PMCPMC7661604
OpenAlexW3086850370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.