ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2020
Concerns of Primary Care Clinicians Practicing in an Integrated Health System: a Qualitative Study.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adoption of the Reference Framework for Preventive Care for Older Adults: a study of primary care physicians.Family medicine and community health · 2026Article
- Factors that influence the commissioning and implementation of integrated care for adults at risk of cardiovascular disease and mild-to-moderate mental health concerns in the UK: a systematic review protocol.Systematic reviews · 2025Article
- The Role of Homogeneous Waiting Group Criteria in Patient Referrals: Views of General Practitioners and Specialists in South Tyrol, Italy.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The Risks and Benefits of Physician Practice Acquisition and Consolidation: A Narrative Review of Peer-Reviewed Publications Between 2009 and 2022 in the United States.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Review
- From moral distress to resilient ethical climate among general practitioners: Fostering awareness. A qualitative pilot study.PloS one · 2024Article
- Burnout Among Hospitalists During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic: a National Mixed Methods Survey Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Article
- Barriers to Adoption of a Secure Text Messaging System: a Qualitative Study of Practicing Clinicians.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Article
- Patients' Experience of Specialty Care Coordination: Survey Development and Validation.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2023Article
- Lessons Learned From VHA's Rapid Implementation of Virtual Whole Health Peer-Led Groups During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Staff Perspectives.Global advances in health and medicine · 2022Article
- "Chiropractic is manual therapy, not talk therapy": a qualitative analysis exploring perceived barriers to remote consultations by chiropractors.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2021Article
- Electronic consultations and economies of scale: a qualitative study of clinician perspectives on scaling up e-consult delivery.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Article
- Involving Citizens in Integrated Care. Lessons Learned Through Participatory Action Research in Three Communities in the Netherlands.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClinician well-being is a major priority for healthcare organizations. However, the impact of workplace environment on clinicians' well-being is poorly understood. Integrated health systems are a particularly relevant type of practice environment to focus on, given the increasing rates of practice consolidation and integration.
objectiveTo improve understanding of the concerns of primary care clinicians (PCCs) practicing in an integrated health system.
designWe analyzed free-text comment box responses offered on a national survey about care coordination by 555 PCCs in the Veterans Health Administration, one of the largest integrated health systems in the USA.
participantsA total of 555 PCCs who left free-text comments on a national survey of care coordination in the VHA (30% out of 1862 eligible respondents). Demographics and coordination scale scores were similar between respondents who left comments vs. those who did not. APPROACH: The data were coded and analyzed in line with the grounded theory approach. Key themes were identified by team consensus and illustrative quotations were chosen to illustrate each theme. KEY
resultsVHA PCCs described some pressures shared across practice environments, such as prohibitive administrative burden, but also reported several concerns particular to integrated settings, including "dumping" by specialists and moral distress related to a concern for patients. Frustrations due to several aspects of responsibility around referrals may be unique to integrated health systems with salaried clinicians and/or where specialists have the ability to reject referrals.
conclusionPCCs in integrated health systems feel many of the same pressures as their counterparts in non-integrated settings, but they are also confronted with unique stressors related to these systems' organizational features that restrict clinicians' autonomy. An understanding of these concerns can guide efforts to improve the well-being of PCCs in existing integrated health systems, as well as in practices on their way to integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.