Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32918130›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2021

Acute toxicity and tolerability of anthracycline-based chemotherapy regimens in older versus younger patients with breast cancer: real-world data.

Ana Raquel Monteiro, Ana Rita Garcia, Sara Póvoa, Rita Félix Soares, Filipa Macedo, Tatiana Cunha Pereira, Isabel Domingues, Isabel Pazos, Gabriela Sousa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A pragmatic, single-arm clinical trial of a dose modification algorithm for preventing cytopenia-related delays during FOLFOX chemotherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ana Raquel MonteiroMedical Oncology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Coimbra Francisco Gentil, Av. Bissaya Barreto 98, 3000-075, Coimbra, Portugal. anaraquelmonteiro13@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9305-1496
Ana Rita GarciaMedical Oncology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Coimbra Francisco Gentil, Av. Bissaya Barreto 98, 3000-075, Coimbra, Portugal.
Sara PóvoaMedical Oncology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Coimbra Francisco Gentil, Av. Bissaya Barreto 98, 3000-075, Coimbra, Portugal.
Rita Félix SoaresMedical Oncology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Coimbra Francisco Gentil, Av. Bissaya Barreto 98, 3000-075, Coimbra, Portugal.
Filipa MacedoMedical Oncology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Coimbra Francisco Gentil, Av. Bissaya Barreto 98, 3000-075, Coimbra, Portugal.
Tatiana Cunha PereiraMedical Oncology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Coimbra Francisco Gentil, Av. Bissaya Barreto 98, 3000-075, Coimbra, Portugal.
Isabel DominguesMedical Oncology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Coimbra Francisco Gentil, Av. Bissaya Barreto 98, 3000-075, Coimbra, Portugal.
Isabel PazosMedical Oncology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Coimbra Francisco Gentil, Av. Bissaya Barreto 98, 3000-075, Coimbra, Portugal.
Gabriela SousaMedical Oncology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Coimbra Francisco Gentil, Av. Bissaya Barreto 98, 3000-075, Coimbra, Portugal.
Instituto Português de Oncologia de Coimbra Francisco Gentil · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the non-cardiac acute toxicity and tolerability profile of anthracycline-based regimens between older versus younger women diagnosed with breast cancer in a real-world setting.

methodsRetrospective cohort of female patients diagnosed with breast cancer and treated with neoadjuvant or adjuvant anthracycline-based regimens between 2017 and 2019. Patients were grouped in young versus older, using an age of 65 as cut-off. Differences in non-cardiac acute toxicity and change in treatment plan were examined.

resultsAmong the 559 patients, 19.5% were aged ≥ 65 years. Regimens used were fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide in 56.2% of patients, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in 33.3%, and epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in 10.5%; there were no differences in incidence of grade 3 or 4 toxicities between regimens (p = 0.184). Acute grade 3 or 4 toxicities occurred more frequently in the older group (33.9% versus 10.7%, p < 0.0001, OR 4.304, 95%-CI [2.619-7.073]). Delay of at least one chemotherapy cycle due to toxicity occurred more frequently in the older group (24.8% versus 9.3%, p < 0.0001, OR 3.199, 95%-CI [1.867-5.481]). Early termination of treatment also occurred more frequently in the older group (11.9% versus 1.6%, p < 0.0001, OR 8.571, 95%-CI [3.331-22.048]).

conclusionAlthough acute grade 3 or 4 toxicities were more frequent in older patients, which resulted in increased cycle delay and/or premature termination of treatment, overall treatment was still reasonably well-tolerated, with 88.1% of older patients completing the planed anthracycline regimen.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnthracyclinesBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultAnthracyclinesAdjuvant chemotherapyAnthracyclinesBreast cancerNeoadjuvant chemotherapyOlder patientsToxicity

Identifiers

PMID32918130
OpenAlexW3084514912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.