Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32917880›Full record

SynthesisNature communications2020

A meta-analysis on decomposition quantifies afterlife effects of plant diversity as a global change driver.

Akira S Mori, J Hans C Cornelissen, Saori Fujii, Kei-Ichi Okada, Forest Isbell

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Biodiversity mitigates drought effects in the decomposer system across biomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Perspective: sustainability challenges, opportunities and solutions for long-term ecosystem observations.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Akira S MoriGraduate School of Environment and Information Sciences, Yokohama National University, 79-7 Tokiwadai, Hodogaya, Yokohama, 240-8501, Japan. akira.s.mori@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8422-1198
J Hans C CornelissenDepartment of Ecological Science, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Saori FujiiForestry and Forest Products Research Institute, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8687, Japan.
Kei-Ichi OkadaGraduate School of Environment and Information Sciences, Yokohama National University, 79-7 Tokiwadai, Hodogaya, Yokohama, 240-8501, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6243-7353
Forest IsbellDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9689-769X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biodiversity loss can alter ecosystem functioning; however, it remains unclear how it alters decomposition-a critical component of biogeochemical cycles in the biosphere. Here, we provide a global-scale meta-analysis to quantify how changes in the diversity of organic matter derived from plants (i.e. litter) affect rates of decomposition. We find that the after-life effects of diversity were significant, and of substantial magnitude, in forests, grasslands, and wetlands. Changes in plant diversity could alter decomposition rates by as much as climate change is projected to alter them. Specifically, diversifying plant litter from mono- to mixed-species increases decomposition rate by 34.7% in forests worldwide, which is comparable in magnitude to the 13.6-26.4% increase in decomposition rates that is projected to occur over the next 50 years in response to climate warming. Thus, biodiversity changes cannot be solely viewed as a response to human influence, such as climate change, but could also be a non-negligible driver of future changes in biogeochemical cycles and climate feedbacks on Earth.

Indexed as

BiodiversityGlobal WarmingBiodegradation, EnvironmentalBiomassForestsGrasslandOrganic ChemicalsPlantsWetlandsOrganic Chemicals

Identifiers

PMID32917880
PMCPMC7486393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.