Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32917768›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical genetics2021

Assessment of mismatch repair deficiency in ovarian cancer.

Emma J Crosbie, Neil A J Ryan, Rhona J McVey, Fiona Lalloo, Naomi Bowers, Kate Green, Emma R Woodward, Tara Clancy, James Bolton, Andrew J Wallace and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Lynch syndrome for the gynaecologist.The obstetrician & gynaecologist : the journal for continuing professional development from the Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emma J CrosbieDivision of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9WL, UK emma.crosbie@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0284-8630
Neil A J RyanDivision of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9WL, UK.
Rhona J McVeyDepartment of Pathology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9WL, UK.
Fiona LallooManchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, North-West Genomics Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9WL, UK.
Naomi BowersManchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, North-West Genomics Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9WL, UK.
Kate GreenManchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, North-West Genomics Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9WL, UK.
Emma R WoodwardDivision of Evolution and Genomic Medicine, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9WL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6297-2855
Tara ClancyManchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, North-West Genomics Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9WL, UK.
James BoltonDepartment of Pathology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9WL, UK.
Andrew J WallaceManchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, North-West Genomics Laboratory Hub, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9WL, UK.
Raymond F McMahonDepartment of Pathology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9WL, UK.
D Gareth EvansDivision of Evolution and Genomic Medicine, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9WL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8482-5784
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GB

Funding

Department of Health NF-SI-0513-10076Department of Health NIHR-CS-012-009Medical Research Council MR/M018431/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHereditary causes of ovarian cancer include Lynch syndrome, which is due to inherited pathogenic variants affecting one of the four mismatch repair genes involved in DNA repair. The aim of this study was to evaluate tumour mismatch repair deficiency and prevalence of Lynch syndrome in high-risk women referred to the Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine with ovarian cancer over the past 20 years.

methodsWomen with ovarian cancer diagnosed before the age of 35 years and/or with a suggestive personal or family history of Lynch syndrome cancers underwent tumour testing with immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair deficiency and, where indicated,

resultsIn total, 261 ovarian cancers were tested and 27 (10.3%; 95% CI 6.9% to 14.7%) showed mismatch repair deficiency by immunohistochemistry. Three of 7 with MLH1 loss showed

conclusionsTumour mismatch repair deficiency identified by immunohistochemistry is a useful prescreen for constitutional testing in women with ovarian cancer with personal or family histories suggestive of Lynch syndrome.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseAdultAllelesDNA DamageDNA MethylationDNA Mismatch RepairFemaleGenetic Association StudiesGenetic TestingGerm-Line MutationHumansImmunohistochemistryMicrosatellite InstabilityMutationMutL Protein Homolog 1Neoplasm GradingMLH1 protein, humanMutL Protein Homolog 1genetic predisposition to diseasegenetic testinggynecologysurgical oncology

Identifiers

PMID32917768
PMCPMC8479746
OpenAlexW3045777540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.