Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32917675›Full record

ArticleScience advances2020

Incomplete annotation has a disproportionate impact on our understanding of Mendelian and complex neurogenetic disorders.

David Zhang, Sebastian Guelfi, Sonia Garcia-Ruiz, Beatrice Costa, Regina H Reynolds, Karishma D'Sa, Wenfei Liu, Thomas Courtin, Amy Peterson, Andrew E Jaffe and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The annotation ofScience advances · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

David ZhangInstitute of Neurology, University College London (UCL), London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2382-8460
Sebastian GuelfiInstitute of Neurology, University College London (UCL), London, UK.
Sonia Garcia-RuizInstitute of Neurology, University College London (UCL), London, UK.
Beatrice CostaInstitute of Neurology, University College London (UCL), London, UK.
Regina H ReynoldsInstitute of Neurology, University College London (UCL), London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6470-7919
Karishma D'SaInstitute of Neurology, University College London (UCL), London, UK.
Wenfei LiuInstitute of Neurology, University College London (UCL), London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0322-4344
Thomas CourtinSorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 06, UMR S 1127, Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, ICM, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0275-2498
Amy PetersonLieber Institute for Brain Development, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7789-7982
Andrew E JaffeLieber Institute for Brain Development, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6886-1454
John HardyInstitute of Neurology, University College London (UCL), London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3122-0423
Juan A BotíaInstitute of Neurology, University College London (UCL), London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6992-598X
Leonardo Collado-TorresLieber Institute for Brain Development, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2140-308X
Mina RytenInstitute of Neurology, University College London (UCL), London, UK. mina.ryten@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9520-6957
University College London · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBJohns Hopkins University · USAllen Institute for Brain Science · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRLieber Institute for Brain Development · US

Funding

Characterizing the developing human brain transcriptome at single-base resolutionR21MH109956 · NIMH · LIEBER INSTITUTE, INC. · PI JAFFE, ANDREW ELLIS · 2016 to 2017
$502k
Medical Research Council G0701075Medical Research Council G0901254Medical Research Council MR/K01417X/1Medical Research Council MR/L501542/1Medical Research Council MR/N008324/1Medical Research Council MR/N026004/1NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH109956Parkinson's UK G-0907Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growing evidence suggests that human gene annotation remains incomplete; however, it is unclear how this affects different tissues and our understanding of different disorders. Here, we detect previously unannotated transcription from Genotype-Tissue Expression RNA sequencing data across 41 human tissues. We connect this unannotated transcription to known genes, confirming that human gene annotation remains incomplete, even among well-studied genes including 63% of the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man-morbid catalog and 317 neurodegeneration-associated genes. We find the greatest abundance of unannotated transcription in brain and genes highly expressed in brain are more likely to be reannotated. We explore examples of reannotated disease genes, such as

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticTranscriptomeExonsHumansMolecular Sequence AnnotationSequence Analysis, RNA

Identifiers

PMID32917675
PMCPMC7286675
OpenAlexW3034380454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.