Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32917665›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2020

Automated Quantitative Measures of Terminal Duct Lobular Unit Involution and Breast Cancer Risk.

Kevin H Kensler, Emily Z F Liu, Suzanne C Wetstein, Allison M Onken, Christina I Luffman, Gabrielle M Baker, Laura C Collins, Stuart J Schnitt, Vanessa C Bret-Mounet, Mitko Veta and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Associations of Stem Cell Markers with Lobular Involution in Benign Breast Tissue.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Deep learning-based grading of ductal carcinoma in situ in breast histopathology images.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2021
    Article
  12. TDLU Involution and Breast Cancer Risk-Reply.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2021
    Article
  13. Automated Quantitative Measures of Terminal Duct Lobular Unit Involution and Breast Cancer Risk-Letter.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Kevin H KenslerDivision of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-7515-7270
Emily Z F LiuDepartment of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Suzanne C WetsteinMedical Image Analysis Group, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Allison M OnkenDepartment of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Christina I LuffmanDepartment of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Gabrielle M BakerDepartment of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Laura C CollinsDepartment of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Stuart J SchnittDepartment of Pathology, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Vanessa C Bret-MounetDepartment of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mitko VetaMedical Image Analysis Group, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Josien P W PluimMedical Image Analysis Group, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Ying LiuDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine and Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, Missouri.
Graham A ColditzDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine and Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-7307-0291
A Heather EliassenChanning Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Susan E HankinsonChanning Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Rulla M Tamimi *Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-2306-8668
Yujing J Heng *Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. yheng@bidmc.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8930-817X
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USEindhoven University of Technology · NLJewish Hospital · USDana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Risk Factors for Breast Cancer in Younger NursesR01CA050385 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI ELIASSEN, A. HEATHER, WILLETT, WALTER C. · 1989 to 2019
$32.3M
Life Course Cancer Epidemiology Cohort in WomenU01CA176726 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI ELIASSEN, A. HEATHER, WILLETT, WALTER C. · 2018 to 2025
$22.4M
Long Term Multidisciplinary Study of Cancer in Women: The Nurses Health StudyUM1CA186107 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI ELIASSEN, A. HEATHER, STAMPFER, MEIR · 2014 to 2023
$22.3M
Mammographic density and texture features in relation to breast cancer riskR01CA175080 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI TAMIMI, RULLA M · 2013 to 2016
$1.7M
Computational pathology to predict breast cancer risk in benign breast diseaseR21CA187642 · NCI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI SCHNITT, STUART, TAMIMI, RULLA M · 2015 to 2016
$439k
Contributions of tumor molecular subtypes to prostate cancer racial disparitiesK99CA245900 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI KENSLER, KEVIN HUGHES · 2020 to 2021
$163k
NCI NIH HHS K99 CA245900NCI NIH HHS R01 CA050385NCI NIH HHS R01 CA175080NCI NIH HHS R21 CA187642NCI NIH HHS U01 CA176726NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManual qualitative and quantitative measures of terminal duct lobular unit (TDLU) involution were previously reported to be inversely associated with breast cancer risk. We developed and applied a deep learning method to yield quantitative measures of TDLU involution in normal breast tissue. We assessed the associations of these automated measures with breast cancer risk factors and risk.

methodsWe obtained eight quantitative measures from whole slide images from a benign breast disease (BBD) nested case-control study within the Nurses' Health Studies (287 breast cancer cases and 1,083 controls). Qualitative assessments of TDLU involution were available for 177 cases and 857 controls. The associations between risk factors and quantitative measures among controls were assessed using analysis of covariance adjusting for age. The relationship between each measure and risk was evaluated using unconditional logistic regression, adjusting for the matching factors, BBD subtypes, parity, and menopausal status. Qualitative measures and breast cancer risk were evaluated accounting for matching factors and BBD subtypes.

resultsMenopausal status and parity were significantly associated with all eight measures; select TDLU measures were associated with BBD histologic subtype, body mass index, and birth index (

conclusionsAmong Nurses' Health Studies women diagnosed with BBD, TDLU involution is not a biomarker of subsequent breast cancer. IMPACT: TDLU involution may not impact breast cancer risk as previously thought.

Indexed as

AdultBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID32917665
PMCPMC7642012
OpenAlexW3086116609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.