Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32917275›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2020

Hill-based dissimilarity indices and null models for analysis of microbial community assembly.

Oskar Modin, Raquel Liébana, Soroush Saheb-Alam, Britt-Marie Wilén, Carolina Suarez, Malte Hermansson, Frank Persson

Erratum issuedAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Oskar ModinWater Environment Technology, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden. oskar.modin@chalmers.se.ORCID 0000-0002-9232-6096
Raquel LiébanaWater Environment Technology, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Soroush Saheb-AlamWater Environment Technology, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Britt-Marie WilénWater Environment Technology, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Carolina SuarezChemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Malte HermanssonChemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Frank PerssonWater Environment Technology, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-throughput amplicon sequencing of marker genes, such as the 16S rRNA gene in Bacteria and Archaea, provides a wealth of information about the composition of microbial communities. To quantify differences between samples and draw conclusions about factors affecting community assembly, dissimilarity indices are typically used. However, results are subject to several biases, and data interpretation can be challenging. The Jaccard and Bray-Curtis indices, which are often used to quantify taxonomic dissimilarity, are not necessarily the most logical choices. Instead, we argue that Hill-based indices, which make it possible to systematically investigate the impact of relative abundance on dissimilarity, should be used for robust analysis of data. In combination with a null model, mechanisms of microbial community assembly can be analyzed. Here, we also introduce a new software, qdiv, which enables rapid calculations of Hill-based dissimilarity indices in combination with null models.

resultsUsing amplicon sequencing data from two experimental systems, aerobic granular sludge (AGS) reactors and microbial fuel cells (MFC), we show that the choice of dissimilarity index can have considerable impact on results and conclusions. High dissimilarity between replicates because of random sampling effects make incidence-based indices less suited for identifying differences between groups of samples. Determining a consensus table based on count tables generated with different bioinformatic pipelines reduced the number of low-abundant, potentially spurious amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) in the data sets, which led to lower dissimilarity between replicates. Analysis with a combination of Hill-based indices and a null model allowed us to show that different ecological mechanisms acted on different fractions of the microbial communities in the experimental systems.

conclusionsHill-based indices provide a rational framework for analysis of dissimilarity between microbial community samples. In combination with a null model, the effects of deterministic and stochastic community assembly factors on taxa of different relative abundances can be systematically investigated. Calculations of Hill-based dissimilarity indices in combination with a null model can be done in qdiv, which is freely available as a Python package ( https://github.com/omvatten/qdiv ). In qdiv, a consensus table can also be determined from several count tables generated with different bioinformatic pipelines. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationMicrobiotaSoftwareArchaeaBacteriaAerobic granular sludgeAmplicon sequencingBeta diversityBioinformaticsMicrobial ecologyMicrobial fuel cell

Identifiers

PMID32917275
PMCPMC7488682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.