ArticleCritical care (London, England)2020
Reliability of biomarkers of sepsis during extracorporeal therapies: the clinician needs to know what is eliminated and what is not.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Continuous renal replacement therapy attenuates endothelial injury biomarkers in pediatric sepsis: a prospective cohort study.Renal failure · 2026Observational
- Heparin-Binding Protein and Transplant-Associated Inflammation: Emerging Roles in Infection, Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury, and Allograft Dysfunction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Beyond renal support: biological modulation across pathophysiological domains during continuous renal replacement therapy - a randomized pilot study.Frontiers in nephrology · 2026Article
- Presepsin as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarker of Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury: A Scoping Review of Clinical Evidence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Hemoperfusion with Seraph-100 in septic patients removes pathogens and improves clinical outcomes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Sepsis Biomarkers: Advancements and Clinical Applications-A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Article
- Reply to "Potential confounders in linking elevated S100A8/A9 to left ventricular dysfunction in septic shock patients".Critical care (London, England) · 2024Article
- Potential confounders in linking elevated S100A8/A9 to left ventricular dysfunction in septic shock patients.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Article
- PSP is a promising biomarker of sepsis; however, potential elimination by RRT must be considered.Critical care (London, England) · 2022Article
- Biomarkers Predicting Tissue Pharmacokinetics of Antimicrobials in Sepsis: A Review.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2022Review
- MR-proADM has a good ability to predict 28-day mortality in critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: Beware of some potential confounders!Journal of critical care · 2022Article
- Article
- Effects of intermittent hemodialysis on plasmatic levels of endocan.Critical care (London, England) · 2021Article
- Success rate of naso-jejunal tube placement influenced by CRRT: possible removal of metoclopramide.Critical care (London, England) · 2021Article
- High levels of plasma biomarkers at 24 h were found to be strong predictors of 90-day mortality: beware of some potential confounders!Annals of intensive care · 2021Article
- New Decade, Old Debate: Blocking the Cytokine Pathways in Infection-Induced Cytokine Cascade.Critical care explorations · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.