ArticleDiagnostic pathology2020
Clinicopathological heterogeneity between primary and metastatic sites of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm.
Article in Diagnostic pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-omics profiling of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Interplay of genomic instability and the tumor microenvironment (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Discordance of Dual-Tracer PET/CT with Histopathology in a Grade I Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor: A Diagnostic Conundrum.World journal of nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Systemic therapy for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: current landscape and future directions.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2026Review
- Redefining therapeutic thresholds and global guidelines: Toward precision management of intermediate-sized rectal neuroendocrine tumors.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges With Synchronous Lung Adenocarcinoma and Cervical Carcinoma: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
- Computed tomography-guided percutaneous biopsy for assessing tumor heterogeneity in neuroendocrine tumor metastases to the liver.World journal of radiology · 2025Article
- The role of combined FDG and SST PET/CT in neuroendocrine tumors.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Predictors of Long-Term Outcomes After Liver Transplantation for Unresectable Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.Annals of transplantation · 2023Article
- Review
- Review
- Relevance of Volumetric Parameters Applied to [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Glucose Metabolism Modification Induced by Radioligand Therapy with [Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Clinicopathological Features and Postoperative Survival Analysis of Gastric Carcinoma with Neuroendocrine Differentiation.Journal of oncology · 2022Article
- Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals spatiotemporal heterogeneity and malignant progression in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor.International journal of biological sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChromogranin A (CgA), synaptophysin (Syn) and the Ki-67 index play significant roles in diagnosis or the evaluation of the proliferative activity of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs). However, little is known about whether these biological markers change during tumor metastasis and whether such changes have effect on prognosis.
methodsWe analyzed 35 specimens of both primary and metastatic tumor from 779 patients who had been diagnosed as GEP-NENs at Wuhan Union Hospital from August 2011 to October 2019. The heterogeneity of CgA, Syn and Ki-67 index was evaluated by immunohistochemical analysis.
resultsAmong these 779 patients, the three most common sites of NENs in the digestive tract were the pancreas, rectum and stomach. Metastases were found in 311 (39.9%) patients. Among the 35 patients with both primary and metastatic pathological specimens, differences in the Ki-67 level were detected in 54.3% of the patients, while 37.1% showed a difference in CgA and only 11.4% showed a difference in Syn. Importantly, due to the difference in the Ki-67 index between primary and metastatic lesions, the WHO grade was changed in 8.6% of the patients. In addition, a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that patients with Ki-67 index variation had a shorter overall survival (p = 0.0346), while neither Syn variation nor CgA variation was related to patient survival (p = 0.7194, p = 0.4829).
conclusionsOur data indicate that primary and metastatic sites of GEP-NENs may exhibit pathological heterogeneity. Ki-67 index variation is closely related to the poor prognosis of patients with tumor metastasis, but neither Syn variation nor CgA variation is related to patient prognosis. Therefore, clinicopathologic evaluation of the primary tumor and metastatic sites could be helpful for predicting the prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.