ArticleBMC genomics2020
Accurate prediction of DNA N
Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- iDNA-DAPHA: a generic framework for methylation prediction via domain-adaptive pretraining and hierarchical attention.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence for comprehensive DNA methylation analysis: overview, challenges, and future directions.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Methyl-GP: accurate generic DNA methylation prediction based on a language model and representation learning.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- m6Aminer: Predicting the m6Am Sites on mRNA by Fusing Multiple Sequence-Derived Features into a CatBoost-Based Classifier.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- DRSN4mCPred: accurately predicting sites of DNA N4-methylcytosine using deep residual shrinkage network for diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal cancer in the precision medicine era.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Comparative evaluation and analysis of DNA N4-methylcytosine methylation sites using deep learning.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Accurate Prediction of Anti-hypertensive Peptides Based on Convolutional Neural Network and Gated Recurrent unit.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2022Article
- iDNA-ABF: multi-scale deep biological language learning model for the interpretable prediction of DNA methylations.Genome biology · 2022Article
- Systematic Analysis and Accurate Identification of DNA N4-Methylcytosine Sites by Deep Learning.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDNA N4-methylcytosine (4mC) is a critical epigenetic modification and has various roles in the restriction-modification system. Due to the high cost of experimental laboratory detection, computational methods using sequence characteristics and machine learning algorithms have been explored to identify 4mC sites from DNA sequences. However, state-of-the-art methods have limited performance because of the lack of effective sequence features and the ad hoc choice of learning algorithms to cope with this problem. This paper is aimed to propose new sequence feature space and a machine learning algorithm with feature selection scheme to address the problem.
resultsThe feature importance score distributions in datasets of six species are firstly reported and analyzed. Then the impact of the feature selection on model performance is evaluated by independent testing on benchmark datasets, where ACC and MCC measurements on the performance after feature selection increase by 2.3% to 9.7% and 0.05 to 0.19, respectively. The proposed method is compared with three state-of-the-art predictors using independent test and 10-fold cross-validations, and our method outperforms in all datasets, especially improving the ACC by 3.02% to 7.89% and MCC by 0.06 to 0.15 in the independent test. Two detailed case studies by the proposed method have confirmed the excellent overall performance and correctly identified 24 of 26 4mC sites from the C.elegans gene, and 126 out of 137 4mC sites from the D.melanogaster gene.
conclusionsThe results show that the proposed feature space and learning algorithm with feature selection can improve the performance of DNA 4mC prediction on the benchmark datasets. The two case studies prove the effectiveness of our method in practical situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.