Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32916990›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Measurements of Older Adults' Physical Competence under the Concept of Physical Literacy: A Scoping Review.

Yan Huang, Kim-Wai Raymond Sum, Yi-Jian Yang, Nelson Chun-Yiu Yeung

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Physical literacy in older adults: An evolutionary concept analysis.International journal of nursing sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Physical literacy, health and interactive aging: a position paper.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Psychometric Validation of Senior Perceived Physical Literacy Instrument.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Yan HuangDepartment of Sports Science and Physical Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6395-685X
Kim-Wai Raymond SumDepartment of Sports Science and Physical Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4051-9945
Yi-Jian YangDepartment of Sports Science and Physical Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5831-186X
Nelson Chun-Yiu YeungThe Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1375-9086
Chinese University of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical literacy, especially in the fields of physical education and public health, has been gaining global interest in recent years. Applying an appropriate method to measure physical competence under the concept of physical literacy for older adults aligns with the goal of healthy aging. In this scoping review, we reflected on previous empirical studies regarding the measurements of physical competence among older adults holistically and systematically to identify and analyze gaps in the topic of "physical literacy" among older adults as a precursor to a systematic review. We searched five databases using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) for Protocols guidelines: (1) SPORTDiscus; (2) PubMed; (3) Scopus; (4) ScienceDirect; and (5) Web of Science. There were 29 studies included in our thematic analysis. Through our review, we found that 73% of the mean age of the participants comprised older baby boomers who were from 65-74 years old as aging continues. Therefore, more effort should be made in developing physical literacy for older adults with the goal of health promotion. Our results showed that most studies adopted both self-reported and objective measures, in which objective measures were widely embraced by scholars in the measurement, while self-reported measures were encouraged to be included in the assessment as well. Using assessment tools to measure a combination of actual physical competence and perceived physical competence is recommended in the measurement of physical competence, especially in older adults. In addition, other elements of physical literacy should be taken into account when measuring physical competency in older adults. For future implementation, when framing the model to chart physical literacy for older adults, it is important to review the definition again and adopt a holistic measurement system including every aspect of physical literacy.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyPhysical Education and TrainingAgedFemaleHumansMotivationmeasurementsolder adultsphysical competencephysical literacyscoping review

Identifiers

PMID32916990
PMCPMC7558186
OpenAlexW3083981324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.