Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32916983›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Telemonitoring in Chronic Pain Management Using Smartphone Apps: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Usual Assessment against App-Based Monitoring with and without Clinical Alarms.

Carlos Suso-Ribera, Diana Castilla, Irene Zaragozá, Ángela Mesas, Anna Server, Javier Medel, Azucena García-Palacios

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Transforming Chronic Pain Care Through Telemedicine: An Italian Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Using Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) for Mental Health Prevention and Treatment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Carlos Suso-RiberaDepartment of Basic and Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castellón, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2655-1017
Diana CastillaDepartment of Personality, Assessment, and Psychological Treatments, Universidad de Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1631-1220
Irene ZaragozáCiber Fisiopatologia Obesidad y Nutricion (CB06/03 Instituto Salud Carlos III) (Ciber Physiopathology Obesity and Nutrition, CB06/03 Instituto Salud Carlos III Health Institute), 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Ángela MesasPain Clinic, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
Anna ServerPain Clinic, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
Javier MedelPain Clinic, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
Azucena García-PalaciosDepartment of Basic and Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castellón, Spain.
Hebron University · PSUniversitat Jaume I · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESUniversitat de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe usefulness of mHealth in helping to target face-to-face interventions for chronic pain more effectively remains unclear. In the present study, we aim to test whether the Pain Monitor mobile phone application (app) is well accepted by clinicians, and can help improve existent medical treatments for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Regarding this last goal, we compared three treatment conditions, namely usual treatment, usual treatment with an app without alarms and usual treatment with an app with alarms. All treatments lasted one month. The three treatments were compared for all outcomes, i.e., pain severity and interference, fatigue, depressed mood, anxiety and anger.

methodsIn this randomized controlled trial, the usual monitoring method (i.e., onsite;

resultsWith the exception of anger, clinically significant changes (CSC; 30% improvement) were greater in the app + alarm condition across outcomes (e.g., 43.6% of patients experienced a CSC in depressed mood in the app + alarm condition, which occurred in less than 29% of patients in the other groups). The clinicians were willing to use the app, especially the version with alarms.

conclusionsThe use of apps may have some benefits in individual health care, especially when using alarms to tailor treatments.

Indexed as

Chronic PainClinical AlarmsMobile ApplicationsSmartphoneHumansPain Managementchronic painecological momentary assessmentrandomized controlled trialsmartphone apptelemonitoring

Identifiers

PMID32916983
PMCPMC7559749
OpenAlexW3084131226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.