ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Materials Testing for the Development of Biocompatible Devices through Vat-Polymerization 3D Printing.
Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biocompatible designated Resin-3D-printed polymers exhibit reproductive toxicity prevented by Parylene-C.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Microengineered bone models: advances and applications of bone-on-a-chip technology.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- Review
- Review
- Review
- Design considerations for digital light processing bioprinters.Applied physics reviews · 2024Review
- Additive Manufacturing: A Comprehensive Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Urethane dimethacrylate-based photopolymerizable resins for stereolithography 3D printing: A physicochemical characterisation and biocompatibility evaluation.Drug delivery and translational research · 2024Article
- Three-Dimensional Printing of Triboelectric Nanogenerators by Digital Light Processing Technique for Mechanical Energy Harvesting.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2023Article
- Medical 3D printing with polyjet technology: effect of material type and printing orientation on printability, surface structure and cytotoxicity.3D printing in medicine · 2023Article
- Vat photopolymerization 3D printed microfluidic devices for organ-on-a-chip applications.Lab on a chip · 2023Review
- Controlled degradation of polycaprolactone-based micropillar arrays.Biomaterials science · 2023Article
- Multilayer Methacrylate-Based Wound Dressing as a Therapeutic Tool for Targeted Pain Relief.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Nano-liter perfusion microfluidic device made entirely by two-photon polymerization for dynamic cell culture with easy cell recovery.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Biocompatibility enhancement via post-processing of microporous scaffolds made by optical 3D printer.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Mechanical Properties and Biocompatibility of 3D Printing Acrylic Material with Bioactive Components.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Article
- A Poly-(ethylene glycol)-diacrylate 3D-Printed Micro-Bioreactor for Direct Cell Biological Implant-Testing on the Developing Chicken Chorioallantois Membrane.Micromachines · 2022Article
- Applied tutorial for the design and fabrication of biomicrofluidic devices by resin 3D printing.Analytica chimica acta · 2022Review
- Thermal, Mechanical and Biocompatibility Analyses of Photochemically Polymerized PEGDAPharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Mechanical Properties, Cytotoxicity, and Fluoride Ion Release Capacity of Bioactive Glass-Modified Methacrylate Resin Used in Three-Dimensional Printing Technology.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Light-based 3D printing techniques could be a valuable instrument in the development of customized and affordable biomedical devices, basically for high precision and high flexibility in terms of materials of these technologies. However, more studies related to the biocompatibility of the printed objects are required to expand the use of these techniques in the health sector. In this work, 3D printed polymeric parts are produced in lab conditions using a commercial Digital Light Processing (DLP) 3D printer and then successfully tested to fabricate components suitable for biological studies. For this purpose, different 3D printable formulations based on commercially available resins are compared. The biocompatibility of the 3D printed objects toward A549 cell line is investigated by adjusting the composition of the resins and optimizing post-printing protocols; those include washing in common solvents and UV post-curing treatments for removing unreacted and cytotoxic products. It is noteworthy that not only the selection of suitable materials but also the development of an adequate post-printing protocol is necessary for the development of biocompatible devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.