ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Current Utility of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria as Biological Control Agents towards Plant-Parasitic Nematodes.
Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-site evaluation of Chilean native rhizobacteria for the sustainable management of the walnut root-lesion nematodeFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Rhizosphere phosphorus fractions controlled through P fertilization influence wheat infection by Heterodera avenae.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Molecular mechanism of Cinnamomum zeylanicum and Citrus aurantium essential oils against the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Independent Evaluation of Rootstock Resistance and Endophytic Bacteria for Managing Citrus Nematode.Journal of nematology · 2025Article
- Employing Bacillus and Pseudomonas for phytonematode management in agricultural crops.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2024Review
- Biocontrol Potential of Bacillus strains against soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines) and for promotion of soybean growth.BMC microbiology · 2024Article
- PGPR: Key to Enhancing Crop Productivity and Achieving Sustainable Agriculture.Current microbiology · 2024Review
- Upgrading Strategies for Managing Nematode Pests on Profitable Crops.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Biocontrol Potential of Trichoderma Ghanense and Trichoderma Citrinoviride towardJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Revolutionizing nematode management to achieve global food security goals - An overview.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Understanding the dynamic interactions of root-knot nematodes and their host: role of plant growth promoting bacteria and abiotic factors.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Review
- Article
- The Fight against Plant-Parasitic Nematodes: Current Status of Bacterial and Fungal Biocontrol Agents.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria Burkholderia vietnamiensis B418 inhibits root-knot nematode on watermelon by modifying the rhizosphere microbial community.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Review
- Biocontrol potential ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Bacteria as Biocontrol Tool against Phytoparasitic Nematodes.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plant-parasitic nematodes (PPN) are among the most economically and ecologically damaging pests, causing severe losses of crop production worldwide. Chemical-based nematicides have been widely used, but these may have adverse effects on human health and the environment. Hence, biological control agents (BCAs) have become an alternative option for controlling PPN, since they are environmentally friendly and cost effective. Lately, a major effort has been made to evaluate the potential of a commercial grade strain of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) as BCAs, because emerging evidence has shown that PGPR can reduce PPN in infested plants through direct and/or indirect antagonistic mechanisms. Direct antagonism occurs by predation, release of antinematicidal metabolites and semiochemicals, competition for nutrients, and niche exclusion. However, the results of direct antagonism may be inconsistent due to unknown endogenous and exogenous factors that may prevent PGPR from colonizing plant's roots. On the other hand, indirect antagonism may occur from the induced systemic resistance (ISR) that primes whole plants to better fight against various biotic and abiotic constraints, actuating faster and/or stronger defense responses (adaption), enhancing their promise as BCAs. Hence, this review will briefly revisit (i) two modes of PGPR in managing PPN, and (ii) the current working models and many benefits of ISR, in the aim of reassessing current progresses and future directions for isolating more effective BCAs and/or developing better PPN management strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.