Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32916811›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Advances in Antibody Preparation Techniques for Immunoassays of Total Aflatoxin in Food.

Yanan Wang, Jinqing Jiang, Hanna Fotina, Haitang Zhang, Junjie Chen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yanan WangCollege of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang 453003, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9537-2947
Jinqing JiangCollege of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang 453003, China.
Hanna FotinaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Sumy National Agrarian University, 40021 Sumy, Ukraine.ORCID 0000-0002-0761-3681
Haitang ZhangCollege of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang 453003, China.
Junjie ChenCollege of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang 453003, China.
Henan Institute of Science and Technology · CNSumy National Agrarian University · UA

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31702263Program for Innovative Research Team (in Science and Technology) in University of Henan Province 20IRTSTHN025Science and Technology Department, Henan Province 202102110090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aflatoxin (AF) contamination is a major concern in the food and feed industry because of its prevalence and toxicity. Improved aflatoxin detection methods are still needed. Immunoassays are an important method for total aflatoxin (TAF) analysis in food due to its technical advantages such as high specificity, sensitivity, and simplicity, but require high-quality antibodies. Here, we first review the three ways to prepare high-quality antibodies for TAF immunoassay, second, compare the advantages and disadvantages of antigen synthesis methods for B-group and G-group aflatoxins, and third, describe the status of novel genetic engineering antibodies. This review can provide new methods and ideas for the development of TAF immunoassays.

Indexed as

AflatoxinsAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalFood AnalysisFood ContaminationFood SafetyHumansImmunoassayMiceSensitivity and SpecificityZea maysAflatoxinsAntibodies, Monoclonalantibody preparationfood safetyimmunoassaytotal aflatoxin

Identifiers

PMID32916811
PMCPMC7571119
OpenAlexW3084307848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.