ReviewNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Smart ECM-Based Electrospun Biomaterials for Skeletal Muscle Regeneration.
Review in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decellularized matrix grafts and peripheral nerve regeneration.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Nanodelivery of Gentiopicroside for Inflammatory Skin Lesions: Insights from Psoriasis and Diabetic Foot Ulcers.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Decellularization method and tissue region impact the structural properties and composition of porcine vaginal extracellular matrix.Acta biomaterialia · 2026Article
- Bioinspired hydrogel-based regenerative engineering strategies for the structural and functional regeneration of skeletal muscles following volumetric muscle loss.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Review
- Bioassembly of Myoblast Spheroids in Electrofibrillated Scaffolds for 3D Muscle Tissue Biofabrication.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
- Article
- Developments in Extracellular Matrix-Based Angiogenesis Therapy for Ischemic Heart Disease: A Review of Current Strategies, Methodologies and Future Directions.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2025Review
- Moving Toward Biomimetic Tissue-Engineered Scaffolds.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Applications of Diels-Alder Chemistry in Biomaterials and Drug Delivery.Macromolecular bioscience · 2024Review
- How Is Bone Regeneration Influenced by Polymer Membranes? Insight into the Histological and Radiological Point of View in the Literature.Membranes · 2024Review
- Polymer-Based Wound Dressings Loaded with Essential Oil for the Treatment of Wounds: A Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Leveraging Biomaterial Platforms to Study Aging-Related Neural and Muscular Degeneration.Biomolecules · 2024Review
- Biodegradable Materials for Tissue Engineering: Development, Classification and Current Applications.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Review
- Electrospun Nanomaterials Based on Cellulose and Its Derivatives for Cell Cultures: Recent Developments and Challenges.Polymers · 2023Review
- Towards a Material-by-Design Approach to Electrospun Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Based on Statistical Design of Experiments (DOE).Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Porous biomaterial scaffolds for skeletal muscle tissue engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Editorial for the Special Issue on Nanostructured Surfaces and Devices for Biomedical Applications.Micromachines · 2022Article
- Biomaterials for Regenerative Medicine in Italy: Brief State of the Art of the Principal Research Centers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- From Soft to Hard Biomimetic Materials: Tuning Micro/Nano-Architecture of Scaffolds for Tissue Regeneration.Micromachines · 2022Review
- Nanomedicine, a valuable tool for skeletal muscle disorders: Challenges, promises, and limitations.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of smart and intelligent regenerative biomaterials for skeletal muscle tissue engineering is an ongoing challenge, owing to the requirement of achieving biomimetic systems able to communicate biological signals and thus promote optimal tissue regeneration. Electrospinning is a well-known technique to produce fibers that mimic the three dimensional microstructural arrangements, down to nanoscale and the properties of the extracellular matrix fibers. Natural and synthetic polymers are used in the electrospinning process; moreover, a blend of them provides composite materials that have demonstrated the potential advantage of supporting cell function and adhesion. Recently, the decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM), which is the noncellular component of tissue that retains relevant biological cues for cells, has been evaluated as a starting biomaterial to realize composite electrospun constructs. The properties of the electrospun systems can be further improved with innovative procedures of functionalization with biomolecules. Among the various approaches, great attention is devoted to the "click" concept in constructing a bioactive system, due to the modularity, orthogonality, and simplicity features of the "click" reactions. In this paper, we first provide an overview of current approaches that can be used to obtain biofunctional composite electrospun biomaterials. Finally, we propose a design of composite electrospun biomaterials suitable for skeletal muscle tissue regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.