ArticlePloS one2020
Is Day-4 morula biopsy a feasible alternative for preimplantation genetic testing?
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- The outcomes of blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic diseases.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Genetic Diseases: Limits and Review of Current Literature.Genes · 2023Review
- Article
- An Update on Non-invasive Approaches for Genetic Testing of the Preimplantation Embryo.Current genomics · 2022Review
- Can expelled cells/debris from a developing embryo be used for PGT?Journal of ovarian research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the efficacy and clinical outcome of PGT-M undertaken on Day-3, Day-4 and Day-4 "delayed" embryos that were unsuitable for biopsy on Day-3. DESIGN AND
settingCohort-historical study of all consecutive patients admitted to the IVF-PGT-M program in a large tertiary center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The pregnancy rates and the percentages of complete, incomplete diagnosis, PCR failure, abnormal embryos in PGT of Day-3 cleavage-stage, Day-4 and Day-4 "delayed" embryos. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe reviewed the medical files of all consecutive patients admitted to our IVF for a fresh IVF-PGT-M cycle. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the day of blastomere biopsy: Day 3 cleavage-stage, Day-4 morula and Day-4 "delayed" embryos. The laboratory data, genetic diagnostic and clinical results were collected and compared between the different study groups.
resultsNine hundred and six patients underwent PGT-M cycles in our PGT program: 747, 127 and 32 in the Day-3, Day- 4 and Day-4 "delayed" groups, respectively. Ongoing pregnancy rates per transfer and per patient (15.8% and 9.4%, respectively) were non-significantly lower in the Day-4 "delayed", compared to Day-3 (21.4% and 17.5%, respectively) and Day-4 (24.3% and 19.7%, respectively). When comparing ALL morulas (Day-4 and Day-4 "delayed") to ALL cleavage-stage embryos (Day-3, Day-4 and Day-4 "delayed"), a significantly higher ongoing pregnancy rate was demonstrated following the transfer of embryos derived from morula biopsy, as compared to biopsy at the cleavage-stage (33.3% vs 20.5%, p<0.03, respectively).
conclusionDay-4 embryo biopsy is feasible and yields comparable and even higher ongoing pregnancy rate if undertaken at the morula stage. Further studies evaluating the cumulative live-birth rate per started cycles in Day-3 vs Day-4 embryo biopsy for PGT-M are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.