Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32916666›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2020

MRI-based thermal dosimetry based on single-slice imaging during focused ultrasound thalamotomy.

Nathan McDannold, P Jason White, G Rees Cosgrove

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Predicting ablation zones with multislice volumetric 2-D magnetic resonance thermal imaging.International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nathan McDannoldDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1920-5260
P Jason WhiteDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
G Rees CosgroveDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

Noninvasive monitoring of brain tumor development with focused ultrasound andextracellular vesiclesR01EB028686 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI MCDANNOLD, NATHAN J. · 2019 to 2022
$2.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB028686
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) is a noninvasive thermal ablation method approved for the treatment of essential tremor and tremor-dominant Parkinson's disease. This method uses MR temperature imaging (MRTI) to monitor the treatment. Accurately tracking the accumulated thermal dose is important for both safety and efficacy. Currently, MRTI is obtained in a single plane that varies between sonications, preventing direct tracking of the accumulated dose. In this work, we tested a method to estimate this dose during 120 MRgFUS treatments. This method used the MRTI to create simulated thermal images for sonications when the imaging plane was changed. This approach accurately predicted the lesion shapes. The mean Sørensen-Dice similarity coefficient between the lesion segmentations and dose regions at the 17 cumulative min at 43 °C (CEM43) threshold used by the device software was 0.82 but varied among different treatments (range: 0.34-0.95). Tissue swelling appeared to explain when mismatch occurred, although other errors probably contributed. Overall, the mean distance between the lesion segmentations and the 17 CEM43 dose contours was 0.37 ± 0.57 mm. The probability for thermal damage was estimated to be 50% at 13.6 CEM43 and a maximum temperature of 48.6 °C. Due to large thermal gradients, which exceeded 99 CEM43/mm on average, the area where the probability for thermal damage was uncertain was narrow. Overall these results show that the 17 CEM43 threshold is on average a good predictor for thermal lesions, although there will always be a narrow margin where the fate of the tissue is uncertain.

Indexed as

Essential TremorHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingSurgery, Computer-AssistedTemperatureThalamusUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID32916666
PMCPMC8019066
OpenAlexW3085107238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.