Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32915846›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Using speech recognition technology to investigate the association between timing-related speech features and depression severity.

Mao Yamamoto, Akihiro Takamiya, Kyosuke Sawada, Michitaka Yoshimura, Momoko Kitazawa, Kuo-Ching Liang, Takanori Fujita, Masaru Mimura, Taishiro Kishimoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mao YamamotoDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Akihiro TakamiyaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2985-6673
Kyosuke SawadaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Michitaka YoshimuraDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Momoko KitazawaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kuo-Ching LiangDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takanori FujitaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4372-6090
Masaru MimuraDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Taishiro KishimotoDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0557-8648

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are no reliable and validated objective biomarkers for the assessment of depression severity. We aimed to investigate the association between depression severity and timing-related speech features using speech recognition technology.

methodPatients with major depressive disorder (MDD), those with bipolar disorder (BP), and healthy controls (HC) were asked to engage in a non-structured interview with research psychologists. Using automated speech recognition technology, we measured three timing-related speech features: speech rate, pause time, and response time. The severity of depression was assessed using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item version (HAMD-17). We conducted the current study to answer the following questions: 1) Are there differences in speech features among MDD, BP, and HC? 2) Do speech features correlate with depression severity? 3) Do changes in speech features correlate with within-subject changes in depression severity?

resultsWe collected 1058 data sets from 241 individuals for the study (97 MDD, 68 BP, and 76 HC). There were significant differences in speech features among groups; depressed patients showed slower speech rate, longer pause time, and longer response time than HC. All timing-related speech features showed significant associations with HAMD-17 total scores. Longitudinal changes in speech rate correlated with changes in HAMD-17 total scores.

conclusionsDepressed individuals showed longer response time, longer pause time, and slower speech rate than healthy individuals, all of which were suggestive of psychomotor retardation. Our study suggests that speech features could be used as objective biomarkers for the assessment of depression severity.

Indexed as

SpeechArtificial IntelligenceBipolar DisorderCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID32915846
PMCPMC7485753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.