ArticlePloS one2020
Executable biochemical space for specification and analysis of biochemical systems.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computational systems biology provides multiple formalisms for modelling of biochemical processes among which the rule-based approach is one of the most suitable. Its main advantage is a compact and precise mechanistic description of complex processes. However, state-of-the-art rule-based languages still suffer several shortcomings that limit their use in practice. In particular, the elementary (low-level) syntax and semantics of rule-based languages complicate model construction and maintenance for users outside computer science. On the other hand, mathematical models based on differential equations (ODEs) still make the most typical used modelling framework. In consequence, robust re-interpretation and integration of models are difficult, thus making the systems biology paradigm technically challenging. Though several high-level languages have been developed at the top of rule-based principles, none of them provides a satisfactory and complete solution for semi-automated description and annotation of heterogeneous biophysical processes integrated at the cellular level. We present the second generation of a rule-based language called Biochemical Space Language (BCSL) that combines the advantages of different approaches and thus makes an effort to overcome several problems of existing solutions. BCSL relies on the formal basis of the rule-based methodology while preserving user-friendly syntax of plain chemical equations. BCSL combines the following aspects: the level of abstraction that hides structural and quantitative details but yet gives a precise mechanistic view of systems dynamics; executable semantics allowing formal analysis and consistency checking at the level of the language; universality allowing the integration of different biochemical mechanisms; scalability and compactness of the specification; hierarchical specification and composability of chemical entities; and support for genome-scale annotation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.