ArticlePloS one2020
Patients on the psychosis spectrum employ an alternate brain network to engage in complex decision-making.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Brain reward processing mechanisms that underlie complex decision-making are compromised in psychosis. The goal of this research was to advance our understanding of the underlying (1) neural mechanisms and (2) discrete neuro-economic/motivational processes that may be altered in complex decision-making in euthymic patients on the psychosis spectrum (PPS). Utilizing a functional magnetic resonance neuroimaging (fmri) paradigm of a well-validated laboratory measure of complex decision-making (Iowa Gambling Task-IGT), the brain activation patterns of a target group of PPS were compared to a demographically matched healthy comparison group (HMC). These two groups were also evaluated on real-life decision outcomes on day of scan. PPS primarily activate the Dorsal Attentional Network (DAN) in real-life decision outcomes and in achieving similar levels of performance on the IGT as the HMC, in-spite of dysregulated dopamine-based brain-reward circuit and salience network fmri activation patterns. However, PPS report more significant negative outcomes of their decision-making in real-life, compared to HMC. The differential engagement of brain networks by PPS on the IGT appear to be moderated by antipsychotic, dopamine antagonist, medication lifetime/daily dose levels. These findings may also be mediated by extent of dysregulation in brain reward circuitry and salience network associated with psychosis severity in the target PPS group. This is also evident in case studies of unmedicated PPS. We conclude by suggesting that the brain may adapt to this dysregulation by co-opting the DAN network, which is implicated in the related function of problem-solving, towards complex decision-making. The extent of utilization of the DAN network in complex decision-making may be moderated by psychosis severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.