ArticlePloS one2020
Acquisition of handwriting in children with and without dysgraphia: A computational approach.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative analysis of handwriting kinematics in primary and lower secondary school children through a sensorized ink pen: A cross-sectional population-based study.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Factors Affecting the Clarity of Nondominant Handwriting Versus Dominant Handwriting.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2026Article
- Immunotherapy-associated dysgraphia as an early neurocognitive manifestation of immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome: clinical characteristics, mechanistic insights, and assessment challenges.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Article
- Impact of an early educational protocol on the oral language of children born preterm exhibiting phonological fragility: a multicenter randomized clinical trial.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Early handwriting development: a longitudinal perspective on handwriting time, legibility, and spelling.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Tools and Methods for Diagnosing Developmental Dysgraphia in the Digital Age: A State of the Art.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Enhancing Handwriting Performance of Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) Using Computerized Visual Feedback.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Teaching and Rehabilitation of Handwriting for Children in the Digital Age: Issues and Challenges.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Relationship between Product and Process Characteristics of Handwriting Skills of Children in the Second Grade of Elementary School.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Reliability, validity, and measurement invariance of a Chinese handwriting legibility scale among primary students in central China.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Interpol questioned documents review 2019-2022.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023Review
- Computerized handwriting evaluation and statistical reports for children in the age of primary school.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The Interface Between Reading and Handwriting.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Analysis of Graphomotor Tests with Machine Learning Algorithms for an Early and Universal Pre-Diagnosis of Dysgraphia.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- "It Is Not the Robot Who Learns, It Is Me." Treating Severe Dysgraphia Using Child-Robot Interaction.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- Learning Handwriting: Factors Affecting Pen-Movement Fluency in Beginning Writers.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Dysgraphia detection through machine learning.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Handwriting is a complex skill to acquire and it requires years of training to be mastered. Children presenting dysgraphia exhibit difficulties automatizing their handwriting. This can bring anxiety and can negatively impact education. 280 children were recruited in schools and specialized clinics to perform the Concise Evaluation Scale for Children's Handwriting (BHK) on digital tablets. Within this dataset, we identified children with dysgraphia. Twelve digital features describing handwriting through different aspects (static, kinematic, pressure and tilt) were extracted and used to create linear models to investigate handwriting acquisition throughout education. K-means clustering was performed to define a new classification of dysgraphia. Linear models show that three features only (two kinematic and one static) showed a significant association to predict change of handwriting quality in control children. Most kinematic and statics features interacted with age. Results suggest that children with dysgraphia do not simply differ from ones without dysgraphia by quantitative differences on the BHK scale but present a different development in terms of static, kinematic, pressure and tilt features. The K-means clustering yielded 3 clusters (Ci). Children in C1 presented mild dysgraphia usually not detected in schools whereas children in C2 and C3 exhibited severe dysgraphia. Notably, C2 contained individuals displaying abnormalities in term of kinematics and pressure whilst C3 regrouped children showing mainly tilt problems. The current results open new opportunities for automatic detection of children with dysgraphia in classroom. We also believe that the training of pressure and tilt may open new therapeutic opportunities through serious games.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.