Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32915793›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Acquisition of handwriting in children with and without dysgraphia: A computational approach.

Thomas Gargot, Thibault Asselborn, Hugues Pellerin, Ingrid Zammouri, Salvatore M Anzalone, Laurence Casteran, Wafa Johal, Pierre Dillenbourg, David Cohen, Caroline Jolly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Interpol questioned documents review 2019-2022.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. The Interface Between Reading and Handwriting.Frontiers in psychology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Thomas GargotPsychiatrie de l'Enfant et de l'Adolescent, Pitié Salpêtriére-Charles Foix, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1460-5820
Thibault AsselbornCHILI Lab, EPFL University, Route Cantonale, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Hugues PellerinPsychiatrie de l'Enfant et de l'Adolescent, Pitié Salpêtriére-Charles Foix, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Ingrid ZammouriPsychiatrie de l'Enfant et de l'Adolescent, Pitié Salpêtriére-Charles Foix, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Salvatore M AnzaloneCHART Laboratory-EA 4004, TIM, Paris 8 University, Saint Denis, France.
Laurence CasteranReference Center for Speech and Learning Disorders, Grenoble Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Wafa JohalUniversity of New South Wales, Sidney, Australia.
Pierre DillenbourgCHILI Lab, EPFL University, Route Cantonale, Lausanne, Switzerland.
David CohenPsychiatrie de l'Enfant et de l'Adolescent, Pitié Salpêtriére-Charles Foix, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Caroline JollyLPNC, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5726-4184

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Handwriting is a complex skill to acquire and it requires years of training to be mastered. Children presenting dysgraphia exhibit difficulties automatizing their handwriting. This can bring anxiety and can negatively impact education. 280 children were recruited in schools and specialized clinics to perform the Concise Evaluation Scale for Children's Handwriting (BHK) on digital tablets. Within this dataset, we identified children with dysgraphia. Twelve digital features describing handwriting through different aspects (static, kinematic, pressure and tilt) were extracted and used to create linear models to investigate handwriting acquisition throughout education. K-means clustering was performed to define a new classification of dysgraphia. Linear models show that three features only (two kinematic and one static) showed a significant association to predict change of handwriting quality in control children. Most kinematic and statics features interacted with age. Results suggest that children with dysgraphia do not simply differ from ones without dysgraphia by quantitative differences on the BHK scale but present a different development in terms of static, kinematic, pressure and tilt features. The K-means clustering yielded 3 clusters (Ci). Children in C1 presented mild dysgraphia usually not detected in schools whereas children in C2 and C3 exhibited severe dysgraphia. Notably, C2 contained individuals displaying abnormalities in term of kinematics and pressure whilst C3 regrouped children showing mainly tilt problems. The current results open new opportunities for automatic detection of children with dysgraphia in classroom. We also believe that the training of pressure and tilt may open new therapeutic opportunities through serious games.

Indexed as

HandwritingAgraphiaBiomechanical PhenomenaChildFemaleHumansMaleMotor Skills

Identifiers

PMID32915793
PMCPMC7485885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.