Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32915762›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

Dynamic Panel Estimate-Based Health Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Rates to Inform Public Health Policy: Model Development and Validation.

James Francis Oehmke, Theresa B Oehmke, Lauren Nadya Singh, Lori Ann Post

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Has Omicron Changed the Evolution of the Pandemic?JMIR public health and surveillance · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

James Francis OehmkeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2003-3443
Theresa B OehmkeDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8738-8735
Lauren Nadya SinghDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7025-9614
Lori Ann PostDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6261-3254

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSARS-CoV-2, the novel coronavirus that causes COVID-19, is a global pandemic with higher mortality and morbidity than any other virus in the last 100 years. Without public health surveillance, policy makers cannot know where and how the disease is accelerating, decelerating, and shifting. Unfortunately, existing models of COVID-19 contagion rely on parameters such as the basic reproduction number and use static statistical methods that do not capture all the relevant dynamics needed for surveillance. Existing surveillance methods use data that are subject to significant measurement error and other contaminants.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to provide a proof of concept of the creation of surveillance metrics that correct for measurement error and data contamination to determine when it is safe to ease pandemic restrictions. We applied state-of-the-art statistical modeling to existing internet data to derive the best available estimates of the state-level dynamics of COVID-19 infection in the United States.

methodsDynamic panel data (DPD) models were estimated with the Arellano-Bond estimator using the generalized method of moments. This statistical technique enables control of various deficiencies in a data set. The validity of the model and statistical technique was tested.

resultsA Wald chi-square test of the explanatory power of the statistical approach indicated that it is valid (χ

conclusionsDPD models successfully correct for measurement error and data contamination and are useful to derive surveillance metrics. The opening of America involves two certainties: the country will be COVID-19-free only when there is an effective vaccine, and the "social" end of the pandemic will occur before the "medical" end. Therefore, improved surveillance metrics are needed to inform leaders of how to open sections of the United States more safely. DPD models can inform this reopening in combination with the extraction of COVID-19 data from existing websites.

Indexed as

Health PolicyModels, BiologicalModels, StatisticalBetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansPandemicsPneumonia, ViralPublic Health SurveillanceReproducibility of ResultsSARS-CoV-2United StatesCOVID-19COVID-19 guidelinesCOVID-19 health policyCOVID-19 surveillance systemdynamic panel datainfectious disease modelingmodelsreopening Americasurveillance

Identifiers

PMID32915762
PMCPMC7511227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.