ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2020
Phase I Study of Cabozantinib and Nivolumab Alone or With Ipilimumab for Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma and Other Genitourinary Tumors.
Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
78 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 136 citations in OpenAlex.
- Androgen deprivation therapy with apalutamide in the treatment of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: the systematic review of its effectiveness and applicability for Asian men in the targeted investigational treatment analysis of novel anti-androgen (TITAN) trial.International urology and nephrology · 2026Pooled it
- Cabozantinib for different endocrine tumours: killing two birds with one stone. A systematic review of the literature.Endocrine · 2024Pooled it
- Switch Maintenance Therapy for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Pooled it
- Kidney Cancer, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2022Guideline
- Apatinib monotherapy for pretreated advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: a phase 2 trial.The oncologist · 2026Trial
- Phase 2 study of cabozantinib (XL184) with nivolumab and ipilimumab for the treatment of poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (ETCTN10315).The oncologist · 2026Trial
- Phase II study of olaparib and durvalumab in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Trial
- Clinical and biomarker results from a phase II trial of combined cabozantinib and durvalumab in patients with chemotherapy-refractory colorectal cancer (CRC): CAMILLA CRC cohort.Nature communications · 2024Trial
- A Phase I/II Clinical Trial of Pembrolizumab and Cabozantinib in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.Cancer research communications · 2023Trial
- Triplet Strategies in Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Worthy Option in the First-Line Setting?American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting · 2023Trial
- Nivolumab Plus Cabozantinib With or Without Ipilimumab for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Results From Cohort 6 of the CheckMate 040 Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023Trial
- Nivolumab plus ipilimumab plus cabozantinib triplet combination for patients with previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma: Results from a discontinued arm of the phase III CheckMate 9ER trial.European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2022Trial
- A phase 1-2 trial of sitravatinib and nivolumab in clear cell renal cell carcinoma following progression on antiangiogenic therapy.Science translational medicine · 2022Trial
- Nivolumab plus Cabozantinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma.The New England journal of medicine · 2021Trial
- A phase II trial of durvalumab and tremelimumab in metastatic, non-urothelial carcinoma of the urinary tract.Cancer medicine · 2021Trial
- Histological Subtypes and Divergent Differentiation of Urothelial Carcinoma: Histology, Genomics, and Management Implications.European urology · 2026Review
- Advancing clinical trials for rare renal cell carcinoma subtypes: Consensus statements from the International Kidney Cancer Symposium North America 2025 think tank.Urologic oncology · 2026Article
- Tumor-infiltrating plasma cells are a prognostic factor in penile squamous cell carcinoma.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025Article
- Targeting c-MET Alterations in Cancer: A Review of Genetic Drivers and Therapeutic Implications.Cancers · 2025Review
- Evidence-Based Recommendations on the Use of Immunotherapies and Monoclonal Antibodies in the Treatment of Male Reproductive Cancers.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
35 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe assessed the safety and efficacy of cabozantinib and nivolumab (CaboNivo) and CaboNivo plus ipilimumab (CaboNivoIpi) in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) and other genitourinary (GU) malignances. PATIENTS AND
methodsPatients received escalating doses of CaboNivo or CaboNivoIpi. The primary objective was to establish a recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Secondary objectives included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DoR), and overall survival (OS).
resultsFifty-four patients were enrolled at eight dose levels with a median follow-up time of 44.6 months; data cutoff was January 20, 2020. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 75% and 87% of patients treated with CaboNivo and CaboNivoIpi, respectively, and included fatigue (17% and 10%, respectively), diarrhea (4% and 7%, respectively), and hypertension (21% and 10%, respectively); grade 3 or 4 immune-related AEs included hepatitis (0% and 13%, respectively) and colitis (0% and 7%, respectively). The RP2D was cabozantinib 40 mg/d plus nivolumab 3 mg/kg for CaboNivo and cabozantinib 40 mg/d, nivolumab 3 mg/kg, and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg for CaboNivoIpi. ORR was 30.6% (95% CI, 20.0% to 47.5%) for all patients and 38.5% (95% CI, 13.9% to 68.4%) for patients with mUC. Median DoR was 21.0 months (95% CI, 5.4 to 24.1 months) for all patients and not reached for patients with mUC. Median PFS was 5.1 months (95% CI, 3.5 to 6.9 months) for all patients and 12.8 months (95% CI, 1.8 to 24.1 months) for patients with mUC. Median OS was 12.6 months (95% CI, 6.9 to 18.8 months) for all patients and 25.4 months (95% CI, 5.7 to 41.6 months) for patients with mUC.
conclusionCaboNivo and CaboNivoIpi demonstrated manageable toxicities with durable responses and encouraging survival in patients with mUC and other GU tumors. Multiple phase II and III trials are ongoing for these combinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.