Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32915671›Full record

ArticleJournal of biological rhythms2020

Continuous Light Does Not Affect Atherosclerosis in APOE*3-Leiden.CETP Mice.

Maaike Schilperoort, Rosa van den Berg, Claudia P Coomans, Padmini P S J Khedoe, Ashna Ramkisoensing, Sanne Boekestijn, Yanan Wang, Jimmy F P Berbée, Johanna H Meijer, Nienke R Biermasz and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biological rhythms, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Nuclear Receptors and Clock Components in Cardiovascular Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Maaike SchilperoortDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8597-7675
Rosa van den BergDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Claudia P CoomansDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Division of Neurophysiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Padmini P S J KhedoeDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Ashna RamkisoensingDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Division of Neurophysiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Sanne BoekestijnOncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Yanan WangDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Jimmy F P BerbéeDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Johanna H MeijerDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Division of Neurophysiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Nienke R BiermaszDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Patrick C N RensenDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Sander KooijmanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial light exposure is associated with dyslipidemia in humans, which is a major risk factor for the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, it remains unclear whether artificial light at night can exacerbate atherosclerosis. In this study, we exposed female APOE*3-Leiden.CETP mice, a well-established model for human-like lipid metabolism and atherosclerosis, to either a regular light-dark cycle or to constant bright light for 14 weeks. Mice exposed to constant light demonstrated a minor reduction in food intake, without any effect on body weight, body composition, or the weight of metabolic organs. Constant light increased the plasma levels of proatherogenic non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol but did not increase the size or severity of atherosclerotic lesions in the aortic root. Mice exposed to constant light did show lower immune cell counts, which could explain the absence of an effect of atherosclerosis despite increased non-HDL cholesterol levels. Behavioral analysis demonstrated variability in the response of mice to the light intervention. Constant light completely blunted behavioral rhythms in some mice, while others extended their behavioral period. However, rhythm strength was not an important determinant of atherosclerosis. Altogether, these results demonstrate that constant bright light does not affect atherosclerosis in APOE*3-Leiden.CETP mice. Whether artificial light exposure contributes to cardiovascular disease risk in humans remains to be investigated.

Indexed as

LightingAnimalsApolipoproteins EAtherosclerosisCholesterol Ester Transfer ProteinsCircadian RhythmFemaleHumansInflammationMiceMice, TransgenicApolipoproteins ECETP protein, humanCholesterol Ester Transfer Proteinsartificial lightatherosclerosisbiological clockcardiovascular disease

Identifiers

PMID32915671
PMCPMC7683885
OpenAlexW3084722819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.