Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32915449›Full record

ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2021

Multidimensional prognostic index (MPI) predicts successful application for disability social benefits in older people.

Barbara Senesi, Camilla Prete, Giacomo Siri, Alessandra Pinna, Angela Giorgeschi, Nicola Veronese, Roberto Sulpasso, Carlo Sabbà, Alberto Pilotto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Assessment of Disability in Italy: The Laborious Procedure and Sharing of Objectives.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  2. Multidimensional frailty and quality of life: data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Barbara SenesiGeriatrics Unit, Center for Cognitive Disorders and Dementia (CDCD), Department of Geriatric Care, Orthogeriatrics and Rehabilitation, Galliera Hospital, Via Mura delle Cappuccine 14, 16128, Genova, Italy. barbara.senesi@galliera.it.
Camilla PreteGeriatrics Unit, Center for Cognitive Disorders and Dementia (CDCD), Department of Geriatric Care, Orthogeriatrics and Rehabilitation, Galliera Hospital, Via Mura delle Cappuccine 14, 16128, Genova, Italy.
Giacomo SiriScientific Coordination Office, Biostatistics, Galliera Hospital, Genova, Italy.
Alessandra PinnaGeriatrics Unit, Center for Cognitive Disorders and Dementia (CDCD), Department of Geriatric Care, Orthogeriatrics and Rehabilitation, Galliera Hospital, Via Mura delle Cappuccine 14, 16128, Genova, Italy.
Angela GiorgeschiGeriatrics Unit, Center for Cognitive Disorders and Dementia (CDCD), Department of Geriatric Care, Orthogeriatrics and Rehabilitation, Galliera Hospital, Via Mura delle Cappuccine 14, 16128, Genova, Italy.
Nicola VeroneseGeriatrics Unit, Center for Cognitive Disorders and Dementia (CDCD), Department of Geriatric Care, Orthogeriatrics and Rehabilitation, Galliera Hospital, Via Mura delle Cappuccine 14, 16128, Genova, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9328-289X
Roberto SulpassoDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Carlo SabbàDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Alberto PilottoGeriatrics Unit, Center for Cognitive Disorders and Dementia (CDCD), Department of Geriatric Care, Orthogeriatrics and Rehabilitation, Galliera Hospital, Via Mura delle Cappuccine 14, 16128, Genova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe economic recognition of disability is of importance in daily practice, but the tools used in older people are still limited. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the multidimensional prognostic index (MPI) to identify frail older subjects to be submitted to civil invalidity application for disability benefits including Attendance Allowance (AA) indemnity, Carer's Leave (Law 104) and/or Parking Card for people with disabilities.

methodsFrom March 2018 to January 2019, 80 older people were included. The MPI was calculated from comprehensive geriatric assessment information including eight different domains. Civil benefits included attendance allowance (AA) indemnity by the Local Medico-Legal Committee (MLC-NHS) and by the National Institute of Social Security Committee (INPS), Carer's Leave (Law 104), and Parking Card for people with disabilities.

resultsMPI values were associated with an increased probability to obtain a 100% civil disability, AA indemnity, Carer's Leave and a parking card for people with disabilities. MPI score showed a very good accuracy in predicting the civil invalidity benefits with a area-under-curve (AUC) of 87.3 (95% CI 80.6-97.4) to predict the release of AA indemnity, 81.3 (95% CI 68.5-91.1) to predict Care's leave and 70.7 (95% CI 59.4-84.7) to predict the Parking Card release. Moreover, data showed that a cut-off score of MPI ≥ 0.75 could identify the 100% of older subjects who successfully obtained the indemnity release.

conclusionMPI is an excellent predictor of social benefits' release by local and national agencies.

Indexed as

Geriatric AssessmentPersons with DisabilitiesAgedHumansPrognosisSocial SecurityDisabilityDisability benefitsGeriatric assessmentMultidimensional prognostic index

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.