Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32915347›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2021

Things left unsaid: important topics that are not discussed between patients with systemic sclerosis, their carers and their healthcare professionals-a discourse analysis.

Christopher P Denton, Bee Laird, Lizette Moros, Jose Luis Luna Flores

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Patients' Perspectives on the Use of a Newly Developed "Patients' Guide for Doctor's Visit": DocVISITguide.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Patient and Physician Perspectives on Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease.Clinical medicine insights. Circulatory, respiratory and pulmonary medicine · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christopher P DentonDivision of Medicine, Department of Inflammation, Centre for Rheumatology and Connective Tissue Diseases, Royal Free and University College Medical School, University College London, London, UK. c.denton@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3975-8938
Bee LairdThe Research Unit, Hove, UK.
Lizette MorosBoehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
Jose Luis Luna FloresBoehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DEThe Royal Free Hospital · GB

Funding

Boehringer Ingelheim N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSystemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare condition that can be complicated by interstitial lung fibrosis (SSc-ILD)-a major cause of mortality. This study explored information and communication needs of patients with SSc-ILD and their carers to understand what they are and whether they are met.

methodsQualitative research was performed, including in-depth individual interviews and observed conversations between pairs of patients, physicians and nurses, and between patients and physicians discussing experiences of SSc-ILD. The study was performed in Germany, Italy, Spain, the UK and the USA. Participants included 42 SSc-treating physicians, 21 patients with diagnosed SSc-ILD, 16 specialist nurses and five carers.

resultsPrognosis and mortality were the main unspoken topics acknowledged by patients, carers and healthcare professionals. Patients and carers felt afraid to ask physicians about mortality, and most physicians reported avoiding the question because their duty was to give patients hope and avoid causing additional distress. Patients often felt unable to ask physicians about relationships, family and work because of time constraints or because they felt these were not topics physicians would be concerned about. Often, specialist nurses felt that they had insufficient knowledge to provide adequate support.

conclusionKey topics, including mortality and prognosis, are rarely openly discussed, leaving patients uncertain and anxious about the future. By communicating about difficult but important topics, physicians and nurses could help patients and carers manage and plan their lives. This study shows that a multi-professional team-based communication approach is likely to better address patient needs and priorities. KEY POINTS: • Key topics in SSc or SSc-ILD, such as mortality and prognosis, are rarely openly discussed in clinical consultations. • By communicating difficult but important topics, physicians and nurses could help patients manage their disease and plan their lives. • A multi-professional team-based communication approach is likely to better address patient needs and priorities and could be easily implemented without the need for significant additional resources.

Indexed as

CaregiversScleroderma, SystemicDelivery of Health CareGermanyHumansItalySpainInterstitial lung diseaseInterstitial lung fibrosisPatient–physician communicationSpecialist nurseSystemic sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID32915347
PMCPMC7943486
OpenAlexW3086543778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.