Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32915300›Full record

Trial reportJournal of anesthesia2021

Erector spinae plane block versus retrolaminar block for postoperative analgesia after breast surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Sayaka Sotome, Atsushi Sawada, Asaka Wada, Hiroaki Shima, Goro Kutomi, Michiaki Yamakage

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of anesthesia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05261581 early_phase1withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Erector Spina Plane Block(ESPB)'s Effectiveness on Patients With Lumbar Radiculopathy

TypeinterventionalSponsorBezmialem Vakif UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled0ConditionsRadiculopathy, Radiculopathy Lumbar, Pain, BackArmsErector Spinae Plane Block, NSAID, Home Exercise Programme
NCT06021327 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Comparison Of The Analgesic Effect Of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block And Ultrasound-Guided Retrolaminar Block In Patients Undergoing Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled44ConditionsPost-operative Analgesia, Retrolaminar Block, Erector Spinae Plan Block, VATSArmsErector spinae plane block, Retrolaminar block
NCT06710444 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Retrolaminar Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlexandria UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled120ConditionsPostoperative Analgesia, Pain Management, PCNL, Regional Anesthesia BlockArmsultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block, ultrasound-guided retrolaminar plane block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The Utility of Erector Spinae Plane Blocks in Breast Surgery: A Practical Review.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sayaka SotomeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, South 1, West 16, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8543, Japan.
Atsushi SawadaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, South 1, West 16, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8543, Japan. atusihon7@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6005-8736
Asaka WadaDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Hiroaki ShimaDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Goro KutomiDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Michiaki YamakageDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, South 1, West 16, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8543, Japan.
Sapporo Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe newly introduced erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has given anesthesiologists an alternative regional anesthetic technique for thoracic analgesia. Although ESPB and retrolaminar block (RLB) have similar puncture sites, no clinical study comparing ESPB and RLB has been reported. The aim of this study was to compare ESPB and RLB in terms of analgesic efficacy in the context of multimodal analgesia following breast surgery.

methodsFifty female patients undergoing breast surgery under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to receive either ultrasound-guided ESPB or RLB with 20 mL of 0.375% levobupivacaine for postoperative analgesia. The primary outcome was analgesic efficacy in terms of time to first postoperative rescue analgesic after the block procedure. The secondary outcomes were consumption of remifentanil during anesthesia, pain intensity at rest for 24 h postoperatively, and occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).

resultsAfter excluding five patients, 45 patients (22 and 23 patients in the ESPB and RLB group, respectively) were analyzed. Median time until the first postoperative rescue analgesic after the block procedure in the ESPB group was not significantly longer than that in the RLB group (8.6 [range 2.7-24] vs. 4.8 [3.0-24] h; P = 0.83). There was no significant difference in the consumption of remifentanil during anesthesia, pain intensity at rest for 24 h postoperatively, and occurrence of PONV between the two groups.

conclusionESPB is equivalent, and not superior, to RLB for postoperative analgesia after breast surgery when 20 mL of 0.375% levobupivacaine is injected at the fourth thoracic vertebra.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaBreast NeoplasmsNerve BlockFemaleHumansParaspinal MusclesPostoperative PainBreast surgeryErector spinae plane blockIntercostal nerveRetrolaminar block

Identifiers

PMID32915300
OpenAlexW3086295691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.